Abstract
In the title molecule, C9H6BrNS, the planes of the 2-bromo-1,3-thiazole and phenyl rings are inclined at 7.45 (10)° with respect to each other. In the crystal, molecules related by a centre of symmetry are held together via π–π interactions, with a short distance of 3.815 (2) Å between the centroids of the five- and six-membered rings. The crystal packing exhibits short intermolecular S⋯Br contacts of 3.5402 (6) Å.
Related literature
For syntheses and properties of compounds containing a thiazole fragment, see: Kelly & Lang (1995 ▶); Nicolaou et al. (1999 ▶); Cosford et al. (2003 ▶); Fyfe et al. (2004 ▶); Hamill et al. (2005 ▶). For the crystal structures of related compounds, see: Abbenante et al. (1996 ▶); Zhao et al. (2011 ▶); Ghabbour, Chia et al. (2012 ▶); Ghabbour, Kadi et al. (2012 ▶).
Experimental
Crystal data
C9H6BrNS
M r = 240.12
Monoclinic,
a = 5.8934 (3) Å
b = 10.6591 (6) Å
c = 13.8697 (7) Å
β = 90.812 (1)°
V = 871.18 (8) Å3
Z = 4
Mo Kα radiation
μ = 4.89 mm−1
T = 120 K
0.15 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm
Data collection
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003 ▶) T min = 0.527, T max = 0.591
12144 measured reflections
2780 independent reflections
2258 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
R int = 0.045
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029
wR(F 2) = 0.068
S = 1.03
2780 reflections
109 parameters
H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3
Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.
Supplementary Material
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup3.cml
CCDC reference: http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/cr.cgi?rm=csd&csdid=980985
Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (State program No. 3.1168.2011).
supplementary crystallographic information
1. Comment
1,3–Thiazole rings appear in many compounds that exhibit important biological and pharmacological activities. For example, these rings feature in all the potent epothilones (Nicolaou et al., 1999) used aganist multidrug–resistant tumor cell lines. They are also found among pharmaceuticals used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (Fyfe et al., 2004), antibiotic-like compounds (Kelly et al., 1995), and metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype (mGluR5) antagonists (Cosford et al., 2003; Hamill et al., 2005). Herewith we present the title compound (I) prepared by the reaction of 2–amino–4–phenylthiazole with n-butyl nintrine and CuBr (Figure 1).
In I (Fig. 2), the bond lengths and angles are in a good agreement with those found in the related compounds (Abbenante et al., 1996; Zhao et al., 2011; Ghabbour, Chia et al., 2012; Ghabbour, Kadi et al., 2012). The 2-bromo-1,3-thiazole mean plane and phenyl ring are twisted by 7.45 (10)°.
In the crystal, the molecules related by center of symmetry held together viaπ···π interactions proved by short Cg5···Cg6i distance of 3.815 (2) Å between the centroids of five-membered (Cg5) and six-membered (Cg6) rings [symmetry code: (i) –x, 1–y, 1–z]. The crystal packing exhibits short intermolecular S···Brii contacts of 3.5402 (6) Å (Figure 3) [symmetry code: (ii) -1 + x, y, z].
2. Experimental
The 4–phenyl–2–aminothiazole (8.1 g, 46.9 mmol) and CuBr (10.7 g, 74.6 mmol) were dissolved in acetonitrile at room temperature. n-Butyl nitrite (8.7 ml, 7.69 g, 74.6 mmol) was added with stirring, and the solution was heated to 333 K. The reaction completed after 15 min. The reaction mixture was then evaporated to dryness in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (50 ml) and washed with ammonia solution (0.1 M, 2 × 50). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness in vacuo. The residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel (heptane–ethylacetate; 70:3, v/v). The residue crystallized from 5% soluition in heptane. Yield is 53%. The single-crystal of the product I was obtained by slow crystallization from hexane. M.p. = 327–328 K. IR (KBr), ν/cm-1: 3098, 3063, 1476, 1420, 1263, 1070, 1010, 836, 730, 689. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, 304 K): 7.40–6.37 (m, 1H, Ph), 7.46 (t, 2H, J = 7.63, Ph), 7.92 (d, 2H, J = 7.32, Ph), 8.16 (s, 1H, thiazole). Anal. Calcd for C9H6BrNS: C, 45.02; H, 2.52. Found: C, 45.09; H, 2.57.
3. Refinement
All hydrogen atoms were placed in the calculated positions [C—H = 0.95 Å] and refined in the riding model, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C)].
Figures
Fig. 1.

Synthesis of 2–bromo–4–phenylthiazole.
Fig. 2.
Molecular structure of I. Displacement ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level. H atoms are depicted as small spheres of arbitrary radius.
Fig. 3.
The crystal packing of I viewed along the a axis. Dashed lines indicate the intermolecular secondary S···Br interactions.
Crystal data
| C9H6BrNS | F(000) = 472 |
| Mr = 240.12 | Dx = 1.831 Mg m−3 |
| Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Hall symbol: -P 2yn | Cell parameters from 3185 reflections |
| a = 5.8934 (3) Å | θ = 2.4–29.5° |
| b = 10.6591 (6) Å | µ = 4.89 mm−1 |
| c = 13.8697 (7) Å | T = 120 K |
| β = 90.812 (1)° | Prism, yellow |
| V = 871.18 (8) Å3 | 0.15 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm |
| Z = 4 |
Data collection
| Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 2780 independent reflections |
| Radiation source: fine–focus sealed tube | 2258 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.045 |
| φ and ω scans | θmax = 31.0°, θmin = 2.4° |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003) | h = −8→8 |
| Tmin = 0.527, Tmax = 0.591 | k = −15→15 |
| 12144 measured reflections | l = −20→19 |
Refinement
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
| wR(F2) = 0.068 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| S = 1.03 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0323P)2 + 0.1245P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| 2780 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.002 |
| 109 parameters | Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3 |
| 0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3 |
Special details
| Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
| Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Br1 | 0.21824 (3) | 0.90020 (2) | 0.576233 (15) | 0.02238 (7) | |
| S1 | −0.24024 (8) | 0.75866 (5) | 0.55984 (4) | 0.01975 (11) | |
| C2 | 0.0322 (3) | 0.77659 (19) | 0.52049 (14) | 0.0165 (4) | |
| N3 | 0.0960 (3) | 0.70330 (16) | 0.45150 (11) | 0.0161 (3) | |
| C4 | −0.0825 (3) | 0.62475 (17) | 0.42443 (14) | 0.0144 (4) | |
| C5 | −0.2768 (3) | 0.64278 (19) | 0.47549 (14) | 0.0178 (4) | |
| H5 | −0.4135 | 0.5972 | 0.4655 | 0.021* | |
| C6 | −0.0500 (3) | 0.53485 (18) | 0.34463 (14) | 0.0151 (4) | |
| C7 | −0.2155 (3) | 0.4453 (2) | 0.32167 (14) | 0.0184 (4) | |
| H7 | −0.3508 | 0.4419 | 0.3580 | 0.022* | |
| C8 | −0.1849 (4) | 0.3613 (2) | 0.24652 (14) | 0.0214 (4) | |
| H8 | −0.2988 | 0.3009 | 0.2318 | 0.026* | |
| C9 | 0.0134 (4) | 0.3655 (2) | 0.19254 (15) | 0.0213 (4) | |
| H9 | 0.0354 | 0.3080 | 0.1411 | 0.026* | |
| C10 | 0.1778 (4) | 0.4544 (2) | 0.21484 (15) | 0.0208 (4) | |
| H10 | 0.3130 | 0.4576 | 0.1784 | 0.025* | |
| C11 | 0.1471 (3) | 0.53900 (19) | 0.28978 (14) | 0.0174 (4) | |
| H11 | 0.2605 | 0.5999 | 0.3038 | 0.021* |
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Br1 | 0.02065 (11) | 0.02080 (11) | 0.02561 (12) | −0.00021 (8) | −0.00253 (8) | −0.00725 (8) |
| S1 | 0.0181 (2) | 0.0210 (3) | 0.0202 (2) | 0.00233 (19) | 0.00358 (19) | −0.00361 (19) |
| C2 | 0.0156 (9) | 0.0158 (9) | 0.0181 (9) | 0.0006 (7) | −0.0012 (7) | −0.0013 (7) |
| N3 | 0.0167 (8) | 0.0160 (8) | 0.0155 (8) | −0.0008 (6) | −0.0005 (6) | −0.0006 (6) |
| C4 | 0.0162 (9) | 0.0129 (9) | 0.0142 (8) | 0.0009 (7) | −0.0008 (7) | 0.0015 (7) |
| C5 | 0.0173 (9) | 0.0173 (9) | 0.0190 (10) | 0.0002 (7) | 0.0009 (7) | −0.0011 (8) |
| C6 | 0.0187 (9) | 0.0137 (9) | 0.0129 (8) | 0.0020 (7) | −0.0013 (7) | 0.0015 (7) |
| C7 | 0.0194 (9) | 0.0182 (9) | 0.0176 (9) | −0.0013 (8) | 0.0002 (7) | 0.0010 (8) |
| C8 | 0.0264 (10) | 0.0180 (10) | 0.0198 (10) | −0.0019 (8) | −0.0054 (8) | −0.0004 (8) |
| C9 | 0.0307 (11) | 0.0180 (10) | 0.0153 (9) | 0.0045 (8) | −0.0019 (8) | −0.0026 (7) |
| C10 | 0.0224 (10) | 0.0225 (10) | 0.0175 (9) | 0.0041 (8) | 0.0028 (8) | 0.0006 (8) |
| C11 | 0.0184 (9) | 0.0165 (9) | 0.0172 (9) | −0.0013 (7) | 0.0019 (7) | −0.0004 (7) |
Geometric parameters (Å, º)
| Br1—C2 | 1.874 (2) | C7—C8 | 1.388 (3) |
| S1—C5 | 1.713 (2) | C7—H7 | 0.9500 |
| S1—C2 | 1.714 (2) | C8—C9 | 1.398 (3) |
| C2—N3 | 1.295 (2) | C8—H8 | 0.9500 |
| N3—C4 | 1.392 (2) | C9—C10 | 1.388 (3) |
| C4—C5 | 1.368 (3) | C9—H9 | 0.9500 |
| C4—C6 | 1.478 (3) | C10—C11 | 1.390 (3) |
| C5—H5 | 0.9500 | C10—H10 | 0.9500 |
| C6—C11 | 1.398 (3) | C11—H11 | 0.9500 |
| C6—C7 | 1.398 (3) | ||
| C5—S1—C2 | 88.40 (10) | C8—C7—H7 | 119.5 |
| N3—C2—S1 | 116.81 (15) | C6—C7—H7 | 119.5 |
| N3—C2—Br1 | 123.68 (15) | C7—C8—C9 | 120.0 (2) |
| S1—C2—Br1 | 119.49 (11) | C7—C8—H8 | 120.0 |
| C2—N3—C4 | 109.64 (17) | C9—C8—H8 | 120.0 |
| C5—C4—N3 | 114.24 (17) | C10—C9—C8 | 119.28 (19) |
| C5—C4—C6 | 126.63 (18) | C10—C9—H9 | 120.4 |
| N3—C4—C6 | 119.11 (17) | C8—C9—H9 | 120.4 |
| C4—C5—S1 | 110.91 (15) | C9—C10—C11 | 120.80 (19) |
| C4—C5—H5 | 124.5 | C9—C10—H10 | 119.6 |
| S1—C5—H5 | 124.5 | C11—C10—H10 | 119.6 |
| C11—C6—C7 | 118.68 (18) | C10—C11—C6 | 120.30 (19) |
| C11—C6—C4 | 120.27 (17) | C10—C11—H11 | 119.9 |
| C7—C6—C4 | 121.05 (17) | C6—C11—H11 | 119.9 |
| C8—C7—C6 | 120.92 (19) | ||
| C5—S1—C2—N3 | −0.65 (17) | C5—C4—C6—C7 | −8.5 (3) |
| C5—S1—C2—Br1 | 178.28 (13) | N3—C4—C6—C7 | 173.20 (18) |
| S1—C2—N3—C4 | 0.5 (2) | C11—C6—C7—C8 | 0.5 (3) |
| Br1—C2—N3—C4 | −178.35 (13) | C4—C6—C7—C8 | 179.78 (19) |
| C2—N3—C4—C5 | −0.1 (2) | C6—C7—C8—C9 | 0.0 (3) |
| C2—N3—C4—C6 | 178.41 (17) | C7—C8—C9—C10 | −0.2 (3) |
| N3—C4—C5—S1 | −0.4 (2) | C8—C9—C10—C11 | −0.1 (3) |
| C6—C4—C5—S1 | −178.74 (16) | C9—C10—C11—C6 | 0.6 (3) |
| C2—S1—C5—C4 | 0.56 (16) | C7—C6—C11—C10 | −0.8 (3) |
| C5—C4—C6—C11 | 170.74 (19) | C4—C6—C11—C10 | 179.93 (18) |
| N3—C4—C6—C11 | −7.5 (3) |
Footnotes
Supporting information for this paper is available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: CV5440).
References
- Abbenante, G., Fairlie, D. P., Gahan, L. R., Hanson, G. R., Pierens, G. K. & van den Brenk, A. L. (1996). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 10384–10388.
- Bruker (2001). SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
- Bruker (2003). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
- Bruker (2005). APEX2 Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
- Cosford, N. D. P., Tehrani, L., Roppe, J., Schweiger, E., Smith, N. D., Anderson, J. J., Bristow, L., Brodkin, J., Jiang, X. H., McDonald, I., Rao, S., Washburn, M. & Varney, M. A. (2003). J. Med. Chem. 46, 204–206. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Fyfe, F. M. C. T., Gardner, L. S., Nawano, M., Procter, J. M., Rasamison, C. M., Shofield, K. L., Shah, V. K. & Yasuda, K. (2004). WO2004/072031.
- Ghabbour, H. A., Chia, T. S. & Fun, H.-K. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o1631–o1632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ghabbour, H. A., Kadi, A. A., El-Subbagh, H. I., Chia, T. S. & Fun, H.-K. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o1738–o1739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Hamill, T. G., Krause, S., Ryan, C., Bonnefous, C., Govek, S., Seiders, T. J., Cosford, N. D. P., Roppe, J., Kamenecka, T., Patel, S., Gibson, R. E., Sanabria, S., Riffel, K., Eng, W., King, C., Yang, X., Green, M. D., O’Malley, S. S., Hargreaves, R. & Burns, H. D. (2005). Synapse, 56, 205–216. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Kelly, T. R. & Lang, F. (1995). Tetrahedron Lett. 36, 5319–5322.
- Nicolaou, K. C., King, N. P., Finlay, M. R. V., He, Y., Roshangar, F., Vourloumis, D., Vallberg, H., Sarabia, F., Ninkovic, S. & Hepworth, D. (1999). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 7, 665–697. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Zhao, L.-L., Cheng, W.-H. & Cai, Z.-S. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup3.cml
CCDC reference: http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/cr.cgi?rm=csd&csdid=980985
Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


