Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2014 Jan 15;70(Pt 2):o139. doi: 10.1107/S160053681400066X

2-Bromo-4-phenyl-1,3-thia­zole

Alexander S Bunev a,*, Yana I Rudakova a, Vladimir E Statsyuk a, Gennady I Ostapenko a, Victor N Khrustalev b
PMCID: PMC3998304  PMID: 24764865

Abstract

In the title mol­ecule, C9H6BrNS, the planes of the 2-bromo-1,3-thia­zole and phenyl rings are inclined at 7.45 (10)° with respect to each other. In the crystal, mol­ecules related by a centre of symmetry are held together via π–π inter­actions, with a short distance of 3.815 (2) Å between the centroids of the five- and six-membered rings. The crystal packing exhibits short inter­molecular S⋯Br contacts of 3.5402 (6) Å.

Related literature  

For syntheses and properties of compounds containing a thia­zole fragment, see: Kelly & Lang (1995); Nicolaou et al. (1999); Cosford et al. (2003); Fyfe et al. (2004); Hamill et al. (2005). For the crystal structures of related compounds, see: Abbenante et al. (1996); Zhao et al. (2011); Ghabbour, Chia et al. (2012); Ghabbour, Kadi et al. (2012).graphic file with name e-70-0o139-scheme1.jpg

Experimental  

Crystal data  

  • C9H6BrNS

  • M r = 240.12

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 5.8934 (3) Å

  • b = 10.6591 (6) Å

  • c = 13.8697 (7) Å

  • β = 90.812 (1)°

  • V = 871.18 (8) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.89 mm−1

  • T = 120 K

  • 0.15 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm

Data collection  

  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003) T min = 0.527, T max = 0.591

  • 12144 measured reflections

  • 2780 independent reflections

  • 2258 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.045

Refinement  

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029

  • wR(F 2) = 0.068

  • S = 1.03

  • 2780 reflections

  • 109 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.40 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2005); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440sup1.cif

e-70-0o139-sup1.cif (18.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup2.hkl

e-70-0o139-Isup2.hkl (136.5KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup3.cml

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (State program No. 3.1168.2011).

supplementary crystallographic information

1. Comment

1,3–Thiazole rings appear in many compounds that exhibit important biological and pharmacological activities. For example, these rings feature in all the potent epothilones (Nicolaou et al., 1999) used aganist multidrug–resistant tumor cell lines. They are also found among pharmaceuticals used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (Fyfe et al., 2004), antibiotic-like compounds (Kelly et al., 1995), and metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype (mGluR5) antagonists (Cosford et al., 2003; Hamill et al., 2005). Herewith we present the title compound (I) prepared by the reaction of 2–amino–4–phenylthiazole with n-butyl nintrine and CuBr (Figure 1).

In I (Fig. 2), the bond lengths and angles are in a good agreement with those found in the related compounds (Abbenante et al., 1996; Zhao et al., 2011; Ghabbour, Chia et al., 2012; Ghabbour, Kadi et al., 2012). The 2-bromo-1,3-thiazole mean plane and phenyl ring are twisted by 7.45 (10)°.

In the crystal, the molecules related by center of symmetry held together viaπ···π interactions proved by short Cg5···Cg6i distance of 3.815 (2) Å between the centroids of five-membered (Cg5) and six-membered (Cg6) rings [symmetry code: (i) –x, 1–y, 1–z]. The crystal packing exhibits short intermolecular S···Brii contacts of 3.5402 (6) Å (Figure 3) [symmetry code: (ii) -1 + x, y, z].

2. Experimental

The 4–phenyl–2–aminothiazole (8.1 g, 46.9 mmol) and CuBr (10.7 g, 74.6 mmol) were dissolved in acetonitrile at room temperature. n-Butyl nitrite (8.7 ml, 7.69 g, 74.6 mmol) was added with stirring, and the solution was heated to 333 K. The reaction completed after 15 min. The reaction mixture was then evaporated to dryness in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate (50 ml) and washed with ammonia solution (0.1 M, 2 × 50). The organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and evaporated to dryness in vacuo. The residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel (heptane–ethylacetate; 70:3, v/v). The residue crystallized from 5% soluition in heptane. Yield is 53%. The single-crystal of the product I was obtained by slow crystallization from hexane. M.p. = 327–328 K. IR (KBr), ν/cm-1: 3098, 3063, 1476, 1420, 1263, 1070, 1010, 836, 730, 689. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, 304 K): 7.40–6.37 (m, 1H, Ph), 7.46 (t, 2H, J = 7.63, Ph), 7.92 (d, 2H, J = 7.32, Ph), 8.16 (s, 1H, thiazole). Anal. Calcd for C9H6BrNS: C, 45.02; H, 2.52. Found: C, 45.09; H, 2.57.

3. Refinement

All hydrogen atoms were placed in the calculated positions [C—H = 0.95 Å] and refined in the riding model, with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C)].

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Synthesis of 2–bromo–4–phenylthiazole.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Molecular structure of I. Displacement ellipsoids are presented at the 50% probability level. H atoms are depicted as small spheres of arbitrary radius.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

The crystal packing of I viewed along the a axis. Dashed lines indicate the intermolecular secondary S···Br interactions.

Crystal data

C9H6BrNS F(000) = 472
Mr = 240.12 Dx = 1.831 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 3185 reflections
a = 5.8934 (3) Å θ = 2.4–29.5°
b = 10.6591 (6) Å µ = 4.89 mm1
c = 13.8697 (7) Å T = 120 K
β = 90.812 (1)° Prism, yellow
V = 871.18 (8) Å3 0.15 × 0.12 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer 2780 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine–focus sealed tube 2258 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator Rint = 0.045
φ and ω scans θmax = 31.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003) h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.527, Tmax = 0.591 k = −15→15
12144 measured reflections l = −20→19

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.068 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0323P)2 + 0.1245P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2780 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.002
109 parameters Δρmax = 0.40 e Å3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.51 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Br1 0.21824 (3) 0.90020 (2) 0.576233 (15) 0.02238 (7)
S1 −0.24024 (8) 0.75866 (5) 0.55984 (4) 0.01975 (11)
C2 0.0322 (3) 0.77659 (19) 0.52049 (14) 0.0165 (4)
N3 0.0960 (3) 0.70330 (16) 0.45150 (11) 0.0161 (3)
C4 −0.0825 (3) 0.62475 (17) 0.42443 (14) 0.0144 (4)
C5 −0.2768 (3) 0.64278 (19) 0.47549 (14) 0.0178 (4)
H5 −0.4135 0.5972 0.4655 0.021*
C6 −0.0500 (3) 0.53485 (18) 0.34463 (14) 0.0151 (4)
C7 −0.2155 (3) 0.4453 (2) 0.32167 (14) 0.0184 (4)
H7 −0.3508 0.4419 0.3580 0.022*
C8 −0.1849 (4) 0.3613 (2) 0.24652 (14) 0.0214 (4)
H8 −0.2988 0.3009 0.2318 0.026*
C9 0.0134 (4) 0.3655 (2) 0.19254 (15) 0.0213 (4)
H9 0.0354 0.3080 0.1411 0.026*
C10 0.1778 (4) 0.4544 (2) 0.21484 (15) 0.0208 (4)
H10 0.3130 0.4576 0.1784 0.025*
C11 0.1471 (3) 0.53900 (19) 0.28978 (14) 0.0174 (4)
H11 0.2605 0.5999 0.3038 0.021*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Br1 0.02065 (11) 0.02080 (11) 0.02561 (12) −0.00021 (8) −0.00253 (8) −0.00725 (8)
S1 0.0181 (2) 0.0210 (3) 0.0202 (2) 0.00233 (19) 0.00358 (19) −0.00361 (19)
C2 0.0156 (9) 0.0158 (9) 0.0181 (9) 0.0006 (7) −0.0012 (7) −0.0013 (7)
N3 0.0167 (8) 0.0160 (8) 0.0155 (8) −0.0008 (6) −0.0005 (6) −0.0006 (6)
C4 0.0162 (9) 0.0129 (9) 0.0142 (8) 0.0009 (7) −0.0008 (7) 0.0015 (7)
C5 0.0173 (9) 0.0173 (9) 0.0190 (10) 0.0002 (7) 0.0009 (7) −0.0011 (8)
C6 0.0187 (9) 0.0137 (9) 0.0129 (8) 0.0020 (7) −0.0013 (7) 0.0015 (7)
C7 0.0194 (9) 0.0182 (9) 0.0176 (9) −0.0013 (8) 0.0002 (7) 0.0010 (8)
C8 0.0264 (10) 0.0180 (10) 0.0198 (10) −0.0019 (8) −0.0054 (8) −0.0004 (8)
C9 0.0307 (11) 0.0180 (10) 0.0153 (9) 0.0045 (8) −0.0019 (8) −0.0026 (7)
C10 0.0224 (10) 0.0225 (10) 0.0175 (9) 0.0041 (8) 0.0028 (8) 0.0006 (8)
C11 0.0184 (9) 0.0165 (9) 0.0172 (9) −0.0013 (7) 0.0019 (7) −0.0004 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º)

Br1—C2 1.874 (2) C7—C8 1.388 (3)
S1—C5 1.713 (2) C7—H7 0.9500
S1—C2 1.714 (2) C8—C9 1.398 (3)
C2—N3 1.295 (2) C8—H8 0.9500
N3—C4 1.392 (2) C9—C10 1.388 (3)
C4—C5 1.368 (3) C9—H9 0.9500
C4—C6 1.478 (3) C10—C11 1.390 (3)
C5—H5 0.9500 C10—H10 0.9500
C6—C11 1.398 (3) C11—H11 0.9500
C6—C7 1.398 (3)
C5—S1—C2 88.40 (10) C8—C7—H7 119.5
N3—C2—S1 116.81 (15) C6—C7—H7 119.5
N3—C2—Br1 123.68 (15) C7—C8—C9 120.0 (2)
S1—C2—Br1 119.49 (11) C7—C8—H8 120.0
C2—N3—C4 109.64 (17) C9—C8—H8 120.0
C5—C4—N3 114.24 (17) C10—C9—C8 119.28 (19)
C5—C4—C6 126.63 (18) C10—C9—H9 120.4
N3—C4—C6 119.11 (17) C8—C9—H9 120.4
C4—C5—S1 110.91 (15) C9—C10—C11 120.80 (19)
C4—C5—H5 124.5 C9—C10—H10 119.6
S1—C5—H5 124.5 C11—C10—H10 119.6
C11—C6—C7 118.68 (18) C10—C11—C6 120.30 (19)
C11—C6—C4 120.27 (17) C10—C11—H11 119.9
C7—C6—C4 121.05 (17) C6—C11—H11 119.9
C8—C7—C6 120.92 (19)
C5—S1—C2—N3 −0.65 (17) C5—C4—C6—C7 −8.5 (3)
C5—S1—C2—Br1 178.28 (13) N3—C4—C6—C7 173.20 (18)
S1—C2—N3—C4 0.5 (2) C11—C6—C7—C8 0.5 (3)
Br1—C2—N3—C4 −178.35 (13) C4—C6—C7—C8 179.78 (19)
C2—N3—C4—C5 −0.1 (2) C6—C7—C8—C9 0.0 (3)
C2—N3—C4—C6 178.41 (17) C7—C8—C9—C10 −0.2 (3)
N3—C4—C5—S1 −0.4 (2) C8—C9—C10—C11 −0.1 (3)
C6—C4—C5—S1 −178.74 (16) C9—C10—C11—C6 0.6 (3)
C2—S1—C5—C4 0.56 (16) C7—C6—C11—C10 −0.8 (3)
C5—C4—C6—C11 170.74 (19) C4—C6—C11—C10 179.93 (18)
N3—C4—C6—C11 −7.5 (3)

Footnotes

Supporting information for this paper is available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: CV5440).

References

  1. Abbenante, G., Fairlie, D. P., Gahan, L. R., Hanson, G. R., Pierens, G. K. & van den Brenk, A. L. (1996). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 10384–10388.
  2. Bruker (2001). SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Bruker (2003). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Bruker (2005). APEX2 Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  5. Cosford, N. D. P., Tehrani, L., Roppe, J., Schweiger, E., Smith, N. D., Anderson, J. J., Bristow, L., Brodkin, J., Jiang, X. H., McDonald, I., Rao, S., Washburn, M. & Varney, M. A. (2003). J. Med. Chem. 46, 204–206. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Fyfe, F. M. C. T., Gardner, L. S., Nawano, M., Procter, J. M., Rasamison, C. M., Shofield, K. L., Shah, V. K. & Yasuda, K. (2004). WO2004/072031.
  7. Ghabbour, H. A., Chia, T. S. & Fun, H.-K. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o1631–o1632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Ghabbour, H. A., Kadi, A. A., El-Subbagh, H. I., Chia, T. S. & Fun, H.-K. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o1738–o1739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  9. Hamill, T. G., Krause, S., Ryan, C., Bonnefous, C., Govek, S., Seiders, T. J., Cosford, N. D. P., Roppe, J., Kamenecka, T., Patel, S., Gibson, R. E., Sanabria, S., Riffel, K., Eng, W., King, C., Yang, X., Green, M. D., O’Malley, S. S., Hargreaves, R. & Burns, H. D. (2005). Synapse, 56, 205–216. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Kelly, T. R. & Lang, F. (1995). Tetrahedron Lett. 36, 5319–5322.
  11. Nicolaou, K. C., King, N. P., Finlay, M. R. V., He, Y., Roshangar, F., Vourloumis, D., Vallberg, H., Sarabia, F., Ninkovic, S. & Hepworth, D. (1999). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 7, 665–697. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, L.-L., Cheng, W.-H. & Cai, Z.-S. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440sup1.cif

e-70-0o139-sup1.cif (18.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup2.hkl

e-70-0o139-Isup2.hkl (136.5KB, hkl)

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681400066X/cv5440Isup3.cml

Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES