Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Manag Entrep. 2013 Jan 1;18(1):97–118. doi: 10.9774/gleaf.3709.2013.ja.00007

Table 2. Study 2 Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fit Indices and Nested Model Comparisons (N = 719).

Model χ2 df CFI NNFI SRMR Model comparisons Δχ2 Δdf
1. 3 factor 484.23** 51 .97 .97 .05
2. 2 factor A 1373.28** 53 .92 .90 .07 2 vs. 1 889.05** 2
3. 2 factor B 1406.72** 53 .92 .89 .07 3 vs. 1 922.49 ** 2
4. 2 factor C 1509.28** 53 .91 .89 .08 4 vs. 1 1025.05** 2
5. 1 factor 2163.68** 56 .87 .84 .10 5 vs. 1 1679.45** 5
5 vs. 2 790.40 ** 3
5 vs. 3 756.96 ** 3
5 vs. 4 654.40 ** 3

Note. df = model degrees of freedom, CFI = comparative fit index, NNFI = non-normed fit index, SRMR = standardized root mean square residual. 3 factor = physical health support, psychological health support, and safety support; 2 factor A = physical health support and psychological health support items loading on one factor and safety support items loading on second factor; 2 factor B = psychological health support and safety support items loading on one factor and physical health support items loading on second factor; 2 factor C = physical health support and safety support items loading on one factor and psychological health support items loading on second factor.

**

p <.01