Table 3.

Multivariate logistic regression examining the relationship between sexting categories and recent sexual behaviors of YMSM

	Sexually Active (N=1,502)			RAI (N=1,058)			URAI (N=1,058)			IAI (N=1,058)			UIAI (N=1,058)
	OR	95% C.I.	Sig.	OR	95% C.I.	Sig.	OR	95% C.I.	Sig.	OR	95% C.I.	Sig.	OR	95% C.I.	Sig.
Gay a	1.82	(1.91, 2.78)	.006	.92	(.52, 1.62)	.772	.74	(.44, 1.25)	.253	.42	(.22, .77)	.005	.64	(.38, 1.07)	.090
Sexting b
Two-Way	5.79	(4.15, 8.08)	.001	1.30	(.77, 2.18)	.327	1.42	(.83, 2.41)	.197	2.15	(1.29, 3.60)	.003	1.94	(1.08, 3.47)	.027
Received	2.07	(1.33, 3.21)	.001	1.32	(.68, 2.60)	.414	1.45	(.74, 2.83)	.280	1.75	(.91, 3.36)	.093	1.54	(.74, 3.19)	.248
Sent	1.72	(.67, 4.39)	.258	1.30	(.30, 5.56)	.722	1.22	(.31, 4.81)	.780	1.17	(.30, 4.65)	.819	1.26	(.29, 5.52)	.761
Race c
Black	1.06	(.58, 1.93)	.852	1.15	(.58, 2.28)	.679	1.50	(.74, 3.05)	.259	2.12	(1.07, 4.21)	.031	2.80	(1.15, 6.82)	.024
Latino	1.55	(.74, 3.22)	.244	1.58	(.71, 3.54)	.265	.88	(.39, 1.99)	.750	4.07	(1.81, 9.13)	.001	2.69	(1.01, 7.15)	.047
Asian/Pacific Islander	1.02	(.53, 1.97)	.942	1.81	(.86, 3.82)	.118	1.84	(.87, 3.91)	.113	2.49	(1.19, 5.17)	.015	3.12	(1.23, 7.91)	.016
Multiracial	.88	(.38, 2.04)	.772	1.06	(.40, 2.79)	.903	1.64	(.62, 4.34)	.317	3.35	(1.27, 8.87)	.015	3.41	(1.11, 10.42)	.032
Other	.55	(.19, 1.63)	.285	.60	(.16, 2.79)	.446	.21	(.02, 1.83)	.158	3.58	(.89, 14.35)	.072	2.75	(.62, 12.26)	.185
Education	1.03	(.95, 1.11)	.538	1.01	(.92, 1.10)	.887	.87	(.80, .95)	.002	.94	(.86, 1.03)	.167	.92	(.84, 1.00)	.051
Age	1.11	(1.03, 1.19)	.004	.97	(.90, 1.05)	.419	1.03	(.96, 1.10)	.467	1.09	(1.02, 1.18)	.016	1.09	(1.01, 1.17)	.031
Constant	.04		.001	2.64		.270	.55		.484	.14		.022	.05		.001

Notes.

^aNon-gay identified men serve as referent group.

^bNon-sexters serve as referent group

^cWhite men serve as referent group.