Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 7;5(2):217–230. doi: 10.1007/s13244-014-0310-z

Table 3.

Summary of the 16 calculi that were missed in 11 patients on the LD-ASIR 70 images

Size (mm) Location Obstructing (y/n) Attenuation (HU) LD-CT FBP (conspicuity) BMI DLP for LD-CT DLP for CD-CT
1 2.1 Renal-left inter pole n 303 0 35.6 46.23 496.84
2 1.5 Renal-left inter pole n 183 0 35.6 46.23 496.84
3 2 Renal-left inter pole n 212 0 35.6 46.23 496.84
4 1.3 Renal-left inter pole n 139 0 35.6 46.23 496.84
5 3.5 Renal left lower pole n 437 0 29.2 33.99 474.96
6 2.3 Renal-right lower pole n 278 0 47.4 32.6 917.92
7 2.4 Renal-left inter pole n 425 0 22.9 33.31 158.84
8 2.5 Renal-right inter pole n 302 0 19.7 30.18 171.24
9 2.4 Renal-left inter pole n 314 0 26.3 29.64 310.88
10 1.9 Renal-right lowr pole n 201 0 18.2 32.5 129
11 2.3 Renal-left inter pole n 215 0 28.8 33.77 424.34
12 3 Renal-right lower pole n 419 0 30.7 30.72 194.07
13 3.9 Renal-right upper pole n 558 0 30.7 30.72 194.07
14 1.7 Renal-left lower pole n 180 0 28.5 38.21 437.23
15 2 Renal-right lower pole n 233 0 28.4 48.42 299.61
16 2.2 Renal-right lower pole n 299 0 28.4 48.42 299.61

Relative conspicuity of missed calculi between the CD-CT 5-mm ASIR-40 and the 5-mm LD-CT images reconstructed with FBP is scored on a 0–5 point scale (0 = not seen; 1 = much worse; 3 = equal; 4 = better; 5 = excellent)