TABLE 3.
Male rat EC50s [nM] (mean ± SEM) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IT delivery | IV delivery | ||||||
C60 | Vehicle | p-value, n | C60 | Vehicle | p-value, n | Naïve | |
5-HT | 559 ± 104 | 871 ± 130 | 0.06, 4 | 766 ± 113 | 675 ± 59 | 0.25, 4 | 566 ± 130 |
ACh | 265 ± 45* | 239 ± 34* | 0.33, 4 | 231 ± 80 | 97 ± 69 | 0.14, 4 | 123 ± 16 |
SNP | 116 ± 24 | 76 ± 18 | 0.13, 4 | 76 ± 21 | 104 ± 53 | 0.32, 4 | 104 ± 25 |
ET-1 | 38 ± 20 | 48 ± 15 | 0.49, 6 | 26 ± 18 | 113 ± 86 | 0.35, 5 | 28 ± 8 |
Male rat Hillslope values (mean ± SEM) | |||||||
IT delivery | IV delivery | ||||||
C60 | Vehicle | p-value, n | C60 | Vehicle | p-value, n | Naïve | |
5-HT | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 0.10, 4 | 2.0 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 0.57, 4 | 1.7 ± 0.2 |
ACh | 2.6 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 0.10, 4 | 3.8 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 0.09, 3–4 | 1.8 ± 0.3 |
SNP | 2.4 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 0.77, 4 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 0.50, 4 | 2.1 ± 0.4 |
ET-1 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.05* | 0.09, 6 | 1.1 ± 0.1* | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.67, 5 | 1.5 ± 0.1 |
Female rat EC50s [nM] (mean ± SEM) | |||||||
IT delivery | IV delivery | ||||||
C60 | Vehicle | p-value, n | C60 | Vehicle | p-value, n | ||
5-HT | 813 ± 128 | 1268 ± 497 | 0.40, 5 | 932 ± 156 | 990 ± 275 | 0.86, 5 | |
ACh | 1419 ± 843 | 139 ± 28 | 0.16, 5 | 619 ± 233 | 1085 ± 558 | 0.46, 5 | |
SNP | 19 ± 3 | 21 ± 4 | 0.64, 5 | 14 ± 4 | 24.1 ± 4.1 | 0.16, 5 | |
ET-1 | 29 ± 20 | 6.5 ± 2.4 | 0.31, 5 | 13 ± 7 | 23 ± 16 | 0.56, 5 | |
Female rat Hillslope values (mean ± SEM) | |||||||
IT delivery | IV delivery | ||||||
C60 | Vehicle | p-value, n | C60 | Vehicle | p-value, n | ||
5-HT | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.39, 5 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 0.95, 5 | |
ACh | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 0.29, 5 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 0.19, 5 | |
SNP | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 0.35, 4 | 2.0 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.3 | 0.79, 5 | |
ET-1 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.41, 5 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.67, 5 |
*p < 0.05 versus Naïve.