Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 6;10:613–621. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.10.52

Table 3.

Results of the increment calculations for the aromatic moiety of the three constitutional proposals of siphonodictyal E2 (2) and siphonodictyal E3 (3).

Carbon No. Siphonodictyal E2 (2) 2-I 2-II 2-III

16 125.9 131.3 (5.4) 130.9 (5.0) 125.6 (0.3)
17 122.8 124.3 (1.5) 124.3 (1.5) 130.0 (7.2)
18 141.8 141.3 (0.5) 141.7 (0.1) 131.0 (10.8)
19 147.8 142.9 (4.9) 137.9 (9.9) 148.6 (0.8)
20 115.5 118.7 (3.2) 118.7 (3.2) 113.0 (2.5)
21 144.5 145.7 (1.2) 150.7 (6.2) 156.0 (11.5)
Σ [ppm] 16.7 25.9 33.1
Carbon No. Siphonodictyal E3 (3) 3-I 3-II 3-III

16 125.5 131.4 (5.9) 136.7 (11.2) 131.0 (5.5)
17 129.5 130.1 (0.6) 124.4 (5.1) 130.1 (0.6)
18 137.7 136.4 (1.3) 147.1 (9.4) 136.8 (0.9)
19 151.3 148.7 (2.6) 138.0 (13.3) 143.7 (7.6)
20 115.9 118.8 (2.9) 124.5 (8.6) 118.8 (2.9)
21 148.2 151.1 (2.9) 145.8 (2.4) 156.1 (7.9)
Σ [ppm] 16.2 50.0 25.4