Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Oct 25;22(4):246–256. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12073

Table 1.

Differences in patient encounters at the drive-through and walk-in windows

Drive-through window Walk-in window P

(n= 961) (n=1098)

% %
Gender 0.083
    Women 62.9 59.2
    Men 37.1 40.8
Observed age range (years) <0.001
    <40 37.4 27.1
    >60 15.7 28.2
Mobility impaireda <0.001
    Yes (required assistance) 0.9 1.4
    No (ambulatory without assistance) 81.1 97.2
    Unknown 18 1.5
Individual accompanying patient (in the store or in the car) <0.001
    Children or adults 27.9 13.7
    Patient was alone 72.1 86.3
Limited English proficiency 0.024
    Yes (able to counsel) 0.6 1.8
    Yes (needed interpreter) 0 0.2
    No 99.4 98
Accepted patient counseling when offereda 0.005
    Yes 86.7 90.9
    No 13.3 9.1
Talking on cell phone during encounter 0.001
    Yes 3.5 1.2
    No 96.5 98.8
Type of prescription 0.323
At least one new prescription 21.9 24.5
All refill prescriptions 69.9 66.6
Unknown 8.2 8.9
Level of pharmacy busyness 0.001
Low 52 54.1
Medium 38.7 41
High 9.3 4.9
Technician time with patient ( in seconds) <0.001
    Mean 84.4 47.5
    S.D 108.7 90.5
    C.I 77.3 - 91.4 41.9 - 52.9
Pharmacist time with patient( in seconds) <0.001
    Mean 65.4 97.2
    S.D 78.7 114.1
    C.I 60.3 - 70.5 90.2 - 104.1
Amount of information provided to patient <0.001
    Mean 1.9 2.2
    S.D 1.8 1.8
C.I 1.8 - 2.1 2.1-2.4

Abbreviations used:

a

100% of patients were offered counseling by pharmacy personnel.