Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Jul 3;32(11):2034–2049. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2271904

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

A real experimental dataset from a mouse optic nerve with results reconstructed by Bicubic, BM3D [64]+Bicubic, and SBSDI methods. We intentionally selected a suboptimal training set for the SBSDI method based on human images captured on a different SDOCT system to evaluate robustness of the SBSDI algorithm with respect to training sets. (a) Average image. (b) Top Left: Test image (with no subsampling). Top Right: Bicubic reconstruction, PSNR = 28.63, CNR = 0.85, MSR = 3.12. Bottom Left: BM3D+Bicubic reconstruction, PSNR = 31.89, CNR = 2.26, MSR = 11.15. Bottom Right: SBSDI reconstruction, PSNR = 32.69, CNR = 2.64, MSR = 13.69. (c) Top Left: Test image (with 50% data missing). Top Right: Bicubic reconstruction, PSNR = 28.43, CNR = 0.77, MSR = 3.31. Bottom Left: BM3D+Bicubic reconstruction, PSNR = 31.27, CNR = 2.03, MSR = 11.36. Bottom Right: SBSDI reconstruction, PSNR = 32.48, CNR = 2.33, MSR = 13.72. (d) Top Left: Test image (with 75% data missing). Top Right: Bicubic reconstruction, PSNR = 29.18, CNR = 0.69, MSR = 3.30. Bottom Left: BM3D+Bicubic reconstruction, PSNR = 33.26, CNR = 2.06, MSR = 19.50. Bottom Right: SBSDI reconstruction, PSNR = 32.93, CNR = 2.47, MSR = 20.96.