Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr;26(2):192–199. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2014.04.06

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses of lymph node metastasis risk factors of EGC.

Clinicopathological features Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
RR (95% CI) P RR (95% CI) P
Gender
   Male vs. female 0.923 (0.312-2.728) 0.885
Age (year)
   <60 vs. 360 0.915 (0.340-2.462) 0.860
Tumor location
   Upper 1/3 1.000 0.955
   Middle 1/3 0.855 (0.178-4.115) 0.845
   Lower 1/3 1.107 (0.362-3.390) 0.858
Macroscopic type
   I/II vs. III/Mixed 2.234 (0.826-6.041) 0.113
Size (cm)
   <2.0 vs. 32.0 1.682 (0.600-4.716) 0.323
Histology
   Adenocarcinoma vs. other types* 0.730 (0.229-2.325) 0.594
Differentiation
   Differentiated vs. undifferentiated 2.010 (1.062-3.805) 0.032 2.031 (1.035-3.986) 0.039
Ulcer
   Absent vs. present 1.279 (0.347-4.717) 0.712
Lymphovascular invasion
   Absent vs. present 9.053 (3.015-27.183) 0.000 6.102 (1.846-20.170) 0.003
Depth of invasion
   Mucosa vs. submucosa 6.808 (1.898-24.415) 0.003 4.237 (1.107-16.222) 0.035

EGC, early gastric cancer; RR, relative risk; *, signet-ring cell carcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma and et al.