Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 28;3(3):221–230. doi: 10.1242/bio.20146445

Fig. 4. Results of an urban preserve experiment.

Fig. 4.

The R. fulgida floral head treatment UV photographs are displayed atop each data bar. Here the ‘enhanced’ floral guide treatment is slightly enlarged, with ∼60% of the petal surface area UV absorbent and the ‘diminished’ floral guide treatment has ∼25% of the petal surface area UV absorbent. The asterisk represents a significant difference in the number of visitors to the ‘diminished (25% UV)’ treatment relative to the other treatments.