Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb;143(2):269–287. doi: 10.1085/jgp.201311089

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Voltage and dose dependence of pore block by NPPB and MOPS. (A and B) Unitary WT CFTR currents in symmetrical ∼140-mM Cl with and without cytosolically applied blockers, displayed at two bandwidths (fc, filter corner frequency). We could not reliably discern two distinct conductance levels in MOPS (Gunderson and Kopito, 1995). (C) Apparent unitary amplitudes at 10 Hz, with and without blockers, plotted against voltage. (D) Fractional unitary current in 210 µM NPPB and 20 mM MOPS (symbols) and Boltzmann fits (solid lines); midpoint voltages (V1/2) and apparent valences (z) were V1/2 = −85 ± 3 mV and z = −0.45 ± 0.03 for MOPS and V1/2 = 24 ± 2 mV and z = −0.51 ± 0.03 for NPPB. (E, G, I, and K) Slowly decaying macroscopic ”locked-open” currents of E1371S CFTR in the absence of bath ATP; brief applications of 210 µM NPPB or 20 mM MOPS at various voltages (E and G) or of various blocker concentrations at −120 mV (I and K). Dotted lines show zero-current levels estimated from final segments; in E and G, small (<1 pA/40 mV) linear seal currents were subtracted. (F and H) Voltage dependence of macroscopic current block by (F) 210 µM NPPB and (H) 20 mM MOPS (closed symbols) and Boltzmann fits (solid lines); V1/2 = −87 ± 3 mV and z = −0.54 ± 0.07 for MOPS and V1/2 = 7 ± 3 mV and z = −0.48 ± 0.03 for NPPB; open symbols and dotted lines replotted from panel D. (J and L) Dose dependence of macroscopic current block by (J) NPPB and (L) MOPS at −120 mV (closed symbols) and Michaelis–Menten fits (solid lines). Open symbol in L: block by 40 mM of total MOPS (MOPS-H plus MOPS) at pH 6.2; calculated [MOPS] = 3.6 mM: fractional block by MOPS depends on [MOPS], not total [MOPS], confirming anionic MOPS to be responsible for pore block (Ishihara and Welsh, 1997).