Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):302–308. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.19

Table 2. Interdevice comparison of central corneal thickness measurements.

Pairwise comparison Mean paired difference
95% CI of mean difference (µm)
Pearson correlation
1mean±SD (µm) 2P Lower Upper R 3P
OLCR and SD-OCT 4.38±3.79 <0.001 3.30 5.46 0.995 <0.001
OLCR and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer 4.38±6.03 <0.001 2.66 6.09 0.985 <0.001
USP and OLCR 13.20±6.46 <0.001 11.36 15.04 0.985 <0.001
SD-OCT and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer -0.05±6.77 0.987 -1.93 1.92 0.980 <0.001
USP and SD-OCT 17.59±6.76 <0.001 15.67 19.51 0.985 <0.001
USP and Scheimpflug-Placido topographer 17.58±8.13 <0.001 15.27 19.89 0.977 <0.001

1Mean interdevice difference; OLCR: Optical low coherence reflectometry; SD-OCT: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography; USP: Ultrasound pachymetry; 2Repeated-measures ANOVA using Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons; 3Pearson correlation analysis.