Table 2. Comparison of the FA, FAF and OCT findings of the cases.
| Parameters | Acute CSCR | Chronic CSCR | P |
| FA findings, | |||
| Hypo-fluorescence | 34 (85) | 0 (0) | 10.000 |
| Hyper-fluorescence | 0 (0) | 60 (100) | |
| Iso-fluorescence | 6 (15) | ||
| FAF at the focal leakage site in FA | |||
| Hypo-autofluorescence | 34(85) | 51 (85) | 0.48 |
| Hyper-autofluorescence | 0 (0) | 6 (10) | |
| Iso-autofluorescence | 6 (15) | 3 (5) | |
| FAF of serous RD | |||
| Hypo-autofluorescence | 36 (90) | 0 (0) | 10.000 |
| Hyper-autofluorescence | 0 (0) | 54 (90) | |
| Iso-autofluorescence | 4 (10) | 6(10) | |
| PED+ | 3 (7.5) | 3 (5) | 0.44 |
| PED− | 37 (92.5) | 57 (95) | |
| OCT | |||
| Distinct borders | 40 (100) | 0 (0) | 10.000 |
| Indistinct borders | 0 (0) | 60 (100) |
FA: Fluorescein angiography; CSCR: Central serous chorioretinopathy; FAF: Fundus autofluorescence; RD: Retinal detachment; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; PED: Pigment epithelial detachment; 1Statistically significant.
n (%)