Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):376–380. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.32

Table 1. All patients data and type of Piol.

No. 1Age/eye (a) Piol SE(D) 2Age (a) ACD (mm) ECD (mm2)
1 36/R I Care NF 46 NF NF
2 36/L I Care NF 42 NF NF
/R I Care NF 39 NF NF
3 42/L I Care NF 48 NF NF
4 45/R I Care -14.25 50 3.20 2 200
/L I Care -13.75 49 3.20 2 240
5 29/R I Care NF 35 NF NF
6 32/R I Care NF 38 NF NF
7 32/R I Care 13.25 36 3.30 2 150
8 30/R I Care NF 32 NF NF
9 30/R Artisan -12.75 35 3.30 2 100
/L Artisan -10.75 34 3.20 2 250
10 26/R Artisan NF 34 NF NF
11 22/L Artisan NF 32 NF NF
12 31/L Artisan -12.25 36 3.30 2 210
13 30/L ICL -8.75 32 3.00 2 280

1Age at the time of the initial refractive surgery; 2Age at the time of complication development; R: Right eye; L: Left eye; pIOL: Type of phakic intraocular lens; SE: Spherical Equivalent; ACD: Anterior chamber depth; ECD: Endothelial cell density; NF: Not found.