Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 24;10:92. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-92

Table 3.

Observed and true Rift Valley fever animal prevalence, associated exact 95% Confidence interval for two-stage cluster sampling and within specie prevalence by sampling site

Site Location Positive animals/ No sampled Observed [true] prevalence* (%) 95% Confidence interval (%) Within-species prevalence range (%)
1
27 Febrero
2/87
2.47 [2.61]
0.62 – 9.38
0 – 4.88
2
Smara
2/92
2.35 [2.49]
0.59 – 8.95
 
3
Awserd
0/86
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
4
El Aaiun
0/91
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
5
Bir Lehlou
1/60
1.14 [1.19]
0.16 – 7.79
0 – 2.27
6
Bir Lehlou
0/6
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
7
Bir Lehlou
0/10
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
8
Bir Lehlou
0/14
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
9
Tifariti
0/23
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
10
Tifariti
4/61
7.69 [8.22]
2.91 – 18.80
0 – 15.38
11
Tifariti
0/5
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
12
Mehaires
0/17
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
13
Mehaires
0/21
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
14
Mehaires
0/15
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
15
Mehaires
1/20
7.14 [7.63]
1.00 – 36.95
0 – 14.29
16
Mehaires
0/11
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
17
Mijek
0/15
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
18
Mijek
0/66
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
19
Agwanit
0/38
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
20
Agwanit
0/56
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
21
Dougaj
0/42
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
22
Dougaj
0/43
0 [0]
0 – 0
0 – 0
23
Dahkla
1/103
1.75 [1.84]
0.24 – 11.48
0 – 5.26
TOT   11/982 0.97 [1.00] 0.33 – 2.85 0 – 15.38

*Adjusted Wald test between sampling sites (d.f. 22, 974) (p = 0.0001).