Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 9;25(Suppl 1):S97–S107. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.748879

Table 2.

Percent of households testing.

Panel A: Percent tested by location
Control
Intervention
Location % Tested N % Tested N
Amagoro 0.00 59 66.32 95
Angurai 0.00 101 67.44 43
Chemasiri 1.08 93 72.55 51
Chepkero 0.00 29 77.22 79
Chepngoror 0.00 41 87.23 94
Cheptiret 0.00 68 88.37 43
Kamolo 0.00 66 70.83 72
Kamurai 0.00 97 69.23 26
Kapkoi 0.00 61 58.33 48
Kapngetuny 1.56 64 76.47 51
Katakwa 1.03 97 84.81 79
Kesses 0.00 35 79.80 99
Kipsinende 0.00 42 83.33 96
Kocholia 0.00 97 23.36 107
Megun 0.00 60 85.00 40
Olare 0.00 71 62.71 59
Olleinguse 0.00 70 72.06 68
Osajai 0.00 102 68.89 45
Panel B: Relationship between stigma and percent tested in multivariate regression
% Tested % Tested (with controls)
Stigma of most people toward HIV + 0.00308 0.00265
(0.0295) (0.0318)
Community's actions toward HIV + 0.0669*** 0.0716***
(0.0243) (0.0264)
Self stigma if infected 0.0229 0.0194
(0.0223) (0.0236)

Notes: Panel A: Proportion of households who remained in the sample at the time of the follow-up survey who participated in testing via the HBCT campaign. A household was coded as “tested” if one of the adult members of the household tested. Panel B: Standard errors in parentheses;

***

p<0.01, **p<0.05, *p<0.1.