Table 2.

Average connectivity strength (Fisher Z-score) for each network studied for each resting condition and each session. For the mean Z, values in bold indicate that they are the highest of the three resting conditions. Significance testing was done using a two-tailed paired t-test to assess which condition was significantly higher than the other conditions between the different resting conditions for each network studied here. Cells in bold indicate significant differences after multiple comparison correction. For comparisons that were significantly different, the condition that resulted in the higher reliability is indicated in the parentheses.

	Condition	Mean Z	Comparison	P-value
All within-network
Intrasession	EO	0.24	EO vs. EC	0.67
	EC	0.24	EO vs. EF	0.23
	EF	0.24	EC vs. EF	0.2
Intersession	EO	0.21	EO vs. EC	0.67
	EC	0.21	EO vs EF	0.0374 (EF)
	EF	0.22	EC vs. EF	0.0313 (EF)
Attention
Intrasession	EO	0.19	EO vs. EC	0.51
	EC	0.18	EO vs. EF	0.59
	EF	0.19	EC vs. EF	0.88
Intersession	EO	0.16	EO vs. EC	0.21
	EC	0.16	EO vs EF	0.89
	EF	0.17	EC vs. EF	0.36
DMN
Intrasession	EO	0.21	EO vs. EC	0.92
	EC	0.21	EO vs. EF	0.59
Intersession	EF	0.25	EC vs. EF	0.53
	EO	0.17	EO vs. EC	0.85
	EC	0.17	EO vs EF	0.032 (EF)
	EF	0.21	EC vs. EF	0.047 (EF)
Auditory
Intrasession	EO	0.51	EO vs. EC	0.046 (EC)
	EC	0.58	EO vs. EF	0.032 (EF)
	EF	0.43	EC vs. EF	0.00012 (EC)
Intersession	EO	0.54	EO vs. EC	0.093
	EC	0.58	EO vs EF	0.22
	EF	0.49	EC vs. EF	0.009 (EC)
Motor
Intrasession	EO	0.4	EO vs. EC	0.7
	EC	0.41	EO vs. EF	0.12
	EF	0.35	EC vs. EF	0.053
Intersession	EO	0.39	EO vs. EC	0.5
	EC	0.39	EO vs EF	0.99
	EF	0.37	EC vs. EF	0.58
Visual
Intrasession	EO	0.81	EO vs. EC	0.44
	EC	0.86	EO vs. EF	0.14
Intersession	EF	0.73	EC vs. EF	0.025 (EC)
	EO	0.86	EO vs. EC	0.17
	EC	0.88	EO vs EF	0.34
	EF	0.78	EC vs. EF	0.039 (EC)