Table 3.
Focus group results.
| Categories | Themes (n, %) | Examples |
| Expectations (N=10) |
|
|
|
|
Informational resources (3, 30%) | “The educational material was a plus too” |
| Met expectations (2, 20%) | “Met expectations in terms of discussion” | |
| Diabetes knowledge (2, 20%) | “Learn a few things” | |
| No expectations (2, 20%) | “I had no expectations and was delighted” | |
| Social interactions (1, 10%) | “Intrigued by being with other people with diabetes” | |
| Positive aspects of the site (N=55) |
|
|
|
|
Informational resources (17, 31%) | "Liked the comments on the items in the grocery store" |
|
|
Social interaction (16, 29%) | “I did enjoy interacting with others” |
|
|
Diabetes knowledge (6, 11%) | “have had diabetes for 25 years, but learning new things” |
|
|
Usability (6, 11%) | “I am a click and find person—like things immediately at my disposal” |
|
|
Community resources (5, 9%) | “Liked the gym, helped me to exercise” |
|
|
Physical realism (3, 5%) | “Liked the seasons changing in the site” |
|
|
Self-management behavior change (2, 4%) | “Literally changed my life in terms of treatment with insulin—rarely now takes insulin during the day” |
| Negative aspects of the site (N=34) |
|
|
|
|
Usability (26, 76%) | “background noises from others – home sounds, chewing” |
|
|
Social interactions (3, 9%) | “Expected larger group of participants” |
|
|
Informational resources (3, 9%) | “Need clarity on nutrition information by serving” |
|
|
Behavioral realism (2, 6%) | “Avoided gym ‘just like in real life’” |
| Suggestions for changes to site (N=31) |
|
|
|
|
Social interaction (13, 42%) | “Would be good to have group exercises” |
|
|
Informational resources (9, 29%) | “More variety in the grocery store” |
|
|
Usability (5, 16%) | “Would like to hear (bots)and read feedback” |
|
|
Diabetes knowledge (3, 10%) | “Would like nutritionist or other specialists at classes (podiatry, pharmacist) |
|
|
Community resources (1, 3%) | “Would like a walking path” |