Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Optom Vis Sci. 2014 May;91(5):514–521. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000242

Table 5.

Comparisons between the VIP Study and the MEPEDS/BPEDS.

VIP Study MEPEDS/BPEDS
Characteristics of Study

Population-based No Yes

Participants (N) 4,040 8,579

With astigmatism (n, %) 687 (17%) 859 (10%)

Age of participants (months) 36–72 6–72

Race (%)
 Non-Hispanic White 12% 22%
 African American 51% 43%
 Hispanic 20% 35%
 Asian 4% 0%
 American Indian 9% 0%
 Other/Unknown 4% 0%
Risk factors of Astigmatism Odds ratios in the VIP Study Odds ratios in MEPEDS/BPEDS
Spherical equivalent Refractive Error
 > −1.0 D, <2.0 D 1.00 1.00
 ≤ −1.0 D 4.44 (2.95, 6.67) 4.61 (3.56, 5.96)
 ≥ 2.0 D 1.54 (1.28, 1.85) 1.64 (1.39, 1.94)

Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 1.00 1.00
 African American 1.66 (1.22, 2.25) 1.47 (1.18, 1.85)
 Hispanic 2.25 (1.62, 3.12) 2.38 (1.91, 2.97)
 Asian 1.79 (1.08, 2.97) NA
 American Indian 0.70 (0.43, 1.13) NA
 Other/Unknown 2.08 (1.31, 3.30) NA

Age of participants (months)
 36–47 0.81 (0.63, 1.05) 0.85 (0.66, 1.11)
 48–59 0.95 (0.78, 1.16) 0.93 (0.72, 1.20)
 60–72 1.00 1.00

Maternal smoking during pregnancy: Yes vs. No NA 1.47 (1.18, 1.85)

NA = Not Available.

MEPEDS = Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

BPEDS = Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.