Table 3.
Method | # of evaluated Results |
Ng | Nb | Ne | Nu | S0 | # of results |
# of distinct solutions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC/SA | 56 valid results (out of 100 runs) | 65 | 0 | 34 | 82 | 630 | 6 | 5 |
65 | 0 | 35 | 83 | 628 | 9 | 6 | ||
64 | 0 | 32 | 80 | 624 | 1 | 1 | ||
64 | 0 | 33 | 81 | 622 | 9 | 6 | ||
64 | 0 | 34 | 81 | 619 | 10 | 10 | ||
64 | 0 | 35 | 82 | 617 | 3 | 3 | ||
63 | 0 | 31 | 79 | 616 | 8 | 3 | ||
63 | 0 | 32 | 79 | 613 | 1 | 1 | ||
63 | 0 | 33 | 80 | 611 | 7 | 6 | ||
62 | 0 | 29 | 77 | 610 | 1 | 1 | ||
63 | 0 | 34 | 80 | 608 | 1 | 1 | ||
NSGA-II | 54 Pareto- frontier results (out of 100 valid results) | 65 | 0 | 35 | 83 | 628 | 4 | 4 |
65 | 0 | 39 | 85 | 618 | 26 | 26 | ||
65 | 0 | 41 | 86 | 613 | 20 | 20 | ||
65 | 0 | 43 | 87 | 608 | 4 | 4 | ||
NSGA2/MC | 80 Pareto- frontier results (out of 100 valid results) | 65 | 0 | 35 | 83 | 628 | 4 | 4 |
65 | 0 | 37 | 84 | 623 | 20 | 20 | ||
65 | 0 | 39 | 85 | 618 | 32 | 32 | ||
65 | 0 | 41 | 86 | 613 | 20 | 20 | ||
65 | 0 | 43 | 87 | 608 | 4 | 4 |