Table 6.
Method | # of evaluated Results |
Ng | Nb | Ne | Ne Nu | S0 | # of results |
# of distinct solutions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MC/SA | 100 valid results (out of 100 runs) |
40 | 0 | 10 | 46 | 416 | 64 | 19 |
40 | 0 | 11 | 46 | 413 | 5 | 5 | ||
40 | 0 | 12 | 47 | 411 | 1 | 1 | ||
40 | 0 | 13 | 47 | 408 | 4 | 4 | ||
40 | 0 | 14 | 48 | 406 | 1 | 1 | ||
39 | 0 | 9 | 44 | 407 | 10 | 7 | ||
39 | 0 | 10 | 45 | 405 | 5 | 5 | ||
39 | 0 | 11 | 45 | 402 | 6 | 6 | ||
39 | 0 | 12 | 46 | 400 | 3 | 3 | ||
38 | 0 | 11 | 44 | 391 | 1 | 1 | ||
NSGA-II | 100 Pareto-frontier results (out of 100 valid results) | 40 | 0 | 11 | 46 | 413 | 59 | 59 |
40 | 0 | 15 | 48 | 403 | 41 | 41 | ||
NSGA-II/MC | 84 Pareto-frontier results (out of 100 valid results) | 40 | 0 | 11 | 46 | 413 | 20 | 20 |
40 | 0 | 13 | 47 | 408 | 44 | 44 | ||
40 | 0 | 15 | 48 | 403 | 20 | 20 |