Table 11.
Trait |
RUP Supplement |
|
% alfalfa in forage |
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | Yes | SEM | 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | SEM | |
Cut-and-carry trial:2 | ||||||||
Milk yield, kg/d |
1.79f |
1.95e |
0.06 |
1.74g |
1.85f |
1.94e |
1.95e |
0.06 |
Fat yield, g/d |
122 |
123 |
3 |
117 |
122 |
124 |
127 |
4 |
Protein yield, g/d |
90 |
95 |
2 |
85b |
90b |
96a |
98a |
3 |
Milk urea nitrogen, mg/dL |
12.3b |
15.1a |
0.8 |
10.9d |
12.7c |
14.3b |
16.8a |
0.7 |
Grazing trial:3 | ||||||||
Milk yield, kg/d |
1.65 |
1.82 |
0.16 |
1.55g |
1.78f |
1.87e |
|
0.11 |
Fat yield, g/d |
105 |
115 |
11 |
102 |
113 |
116 |
|
8 |
Protein yield, g/d |
84 |
94 |
7 |
78a |
90a,b |
98b |
|
5 |
Milk urea nitrogen, mg/dL | 18.2 | 19.8 | 1.0 | 15.0b | 19.8a | 22.1a | 0.8 |
1Multiparous crossbred ewes of East Friesian and Lacaune breeding.
2n = 16 ewes; 8 pens of 2 ewes each. 4 pens randomly assigned to each supplement treatment. Within supplementation treatment, pens were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 forage treatments, which were applied in a 4 × 4 Latin square design for 10-d periods.
3n = 12 ewes; 3 groups of 4 ewes each. 2 ewes in each group randomly assigned to each supplement treatment. Grazing treatments were arranged in a 3 × 3 Latin square design and randomly applied to groups for 10-d periods.
a,b,c,dMeans within a row and treatment with no superscript in common are different (P < 0.05).
e,f,gMeans within a row and treatment with no superscript in common are different (P < 0.10).