Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 29;9(4):e95943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095943

Table 2. Quantitative evaluation of vessel segmentation algorithms related to the first class of the images.

Method TPR FPR ACC Improvement (Inline graphic) TPR FPR ACC
Our method 0.6988 0.0267 0.9504
Jiang et al. [17] 0.5993 0.031 0.9238 our method vs Jiang et al. 17 −0.14 2.9
Perez et al. [27] 0.5772 0.0367 0.9172 our method vs Perez et al. 21.1 −27.2 3.6
Staal et al. [5] 0.674 0.0178 0.9566 our method vs Staal et al. 3.7 0.5 −0.6
Zana et al. [20] 0.6287 0.0197 0.9375 our method vs Zana et al. 11.1 35.53 1.4
2nd observer 0.7825 0.0378 0.9460 our method vs 2nd observer −10.7 −29.37 0.5

Comparison of performance between the recent studies according to the first class of the images, including 6th, 9th, 12th, 17th, 18th, 20th test images from the DRIVE database.