Table 2. Quantitative evaluation of vessel segmentation algorithms related to the first class of the images.
Method | TPR | FPR | ACC | Improvement () | TPR | FPR | ACC |
Our method | 0.6988 | 0.0267 | 0.9504 | ||||
Jiang et al. [17] | 0.5993 | 0.031 | 0.9238 | our method vs Jiang et al. | 17 | −0.14 | 2.9 |
Perez et al. [27] | 0.5772 | 0.0367 | 0.9172 | our method vs Perez et al. | 21.1 | −27.2 | 3.6 |
Staal et al. [5] | 0.674 | 0.0178 | 0.9566 | our method vs Staal et al. | 3.7 | 0.5 | −0.6 |
Zana et al. [20] | 0.6287 | 0.0197 | 0.9375 | our method vs Zana et al. | 11.1 | 35.53 | 1.4 |
2nd observer | 0.7825 | 0.0378 | 0.9460 | our method vs 2nd observer | −10.7 | −29.37 | 0.5 |
Comparison of performance between the recent studies according to the first class of the images, including 6th, 9th, 12th, 17th, 18th, 20th test images from the DRIVE database.