Table 2. QTL conferring resistance to Verticillium wilt detected in two F2:3 populations of G. hirsutum.
| Population | Growing stage a | QTL | Nearest marker | Position (cM) b | LOD value | Additive effect (a) | Dominant effect (d) | d/a c | Variation explained (%) d | Donor parent e |
| LHB22×JM11 | S (2010) | qVW-c21-1 | DPL0050 | 20.6 | 3.4 | 0.31 | −0.79 | 2.54 | 14.44% | JM11 |
| S (2010) | qVW-c6-1 | MGHES18 | 28.8 | 3.7 | −0.66 | −0.65 | 0.98 | 22.90% | LHB22 | |
| LHB22×NNG | F (2011) | qVW-c6-1 | MGHES18 | 34.5 | 4.2 | −0.72 | −0.78 | 1.08 | 25.70% | LHB22 |
| M (2011) | qVW-c6-1 | MGHES18 | 34.5 | 4.4 | −0.88 | −0.75 | 0.85 | 27.10% | LHB22 | |
| M (2012) | qVW-c6-1 | MGHES18 | 34.5 | 3.9 | −0.70 | −0.75 | 1.07 | 23.10% | LHB22 |
a Verticillium wilt (VW) resistance of LHB22×JM11and LHB22×NNG population evaluated in a greenhouse and disease nursery, respectively. S = seedling stage, F = flowering stage, M = mature stage.
b Position of peak LOD score.
c Ratio of dominant effect and additive effect.
d Percentage of variance explained at peak LOD score.
e Parent that provided the positive allele of the QTL.