Skip to main content
. 2004 May;24(10):4321–4328. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.10.4321-4328.2004

TABLE 2.

Absence of competition for chromatin binding between HMG familiesa

Exptc t80
R20sb
Effect on mobility
Avg time (s) ± SD P value Avg % ± SD P value
HMGN1 8.81 ± 4.2 <0.005 90.2 ± 7.0 0.12 Increase
HMGN1 + HMGN2 4.17 ± 1.4 94.2 ± 3.76
HMGN2 5.87 ± 1.9 <0.02 88.6 ± 5.1 0.10 Increase
HMGN2 + HMGN1 3.77 ± 0.9 93.1 ± 3.8
HMGN1 5.40 ± 1.6 >0.6 91.0 ± 2.0 >0.5 None
HMGN1 + HMGB1 4.68 ± 0.95 91.6 ± 4.0
HMGN2 5.04 ± 0.8 >0.9 94.5 ± 2.9 >0.5 None
HMGN2 + HMGA1 5.08 ± 1.0 93.7 ± 3.5
HMGB1b 5.20 ± 2.8 <0.01 98.5 ± 2.0b >0.4 Decrease
HMGB1 + HMGA1 10.20 ± 2.3 97.3 ± 2.4
HMGB1b 5.78 ± 2.0 >0.7 98.7 ± 3.0b >0.8 None
HMGB1 + HMGN2 5.39 ± 2.6 98.4 ± 0.9
a

Analysis was done as for Table 1.

b

For HMGB1, the R was measured at 45 s rather than at 20 s (i.e., R45s rather than R20s).

c

Mixed chromatin domains were tested in each experiment.