Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;106(6):330–334. doi: 10.1179/2047773212Y.0000000052

Table 2. Quality of slides that had been read in study hospitals according to re-examination by expert slide readers.

Hospital no. Good Poor Unreadable
1 4 (18.2) 13 (59.1) 5 (22.7)
2 2 (10.0) 14 (70.0) 4 (20.0)
3 2 (10.5) 7 (36.8) 10 (52.6)
4 2 (11.7) 15 (88.2) 0
5 2 (10.0) 14 (70.0) 4 (20.0)
6 13 (86.7) 0 2 (13.3)
7 6 (30.0) 12 (60.0) 2 (10.0)
8 5 (62.5) 3 (37.5) 0
9 1 (16.7) 4 (66.7) 1 (16.7)
10 2 (10.0) 13 (65.0) 5 (25.0)
11 13 (65.0) 7 (35.0) 0
12 17 (89.5) 2 (10.5) 0
Total 69 (33.5) 104 (50.5) 33 (16.0)