Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012 Nov;24(4):519–536. doi: 10.1123/pes.24.4.519

Table 7.

Agreements Between Actual and Predicted Intensity Classifications

Groups Kappa (% Agreement) Kappa (95% CI)
Actigraph Equations

Light Intensity

Freedson 0.40 (68.3) 0.33–0.46
Treuth 0.34 (64.42) 0.28–0.41
Trost 0.22 (77.7) 0.12–0.32
Puyau 0.16 (54.3) 0.11–0.21

Moderate Intensity

Freedson 0.15 (57.3) 0.07–0.23
Treuth 0.09 (54.62) 0.01–0.18
Trost 0.34 (68.1) 0.26–0.43
Puyau −0.009 (43.1) −0.09–0.07

Vigorous Intensity

Freedson 0.32 (83.3) 0.22–0.41
Treuth 0.25 (82.1) 0.16–0.34
Trost 0.55 (88.3) 0.46–0.65
Puyau 0.03 (81.7) −0.01–0.08

Actical Equations

Light Intensity

Puyau −0.01 (79.7) −0.09–0.07
Heil 1R 0.32 (80.4) 0.22–0.42
Heil 2R 0.32 (80.3) 0.22–0.42

Moderate Intensity

Puyau 0.14 (54.6) 0.07–0.21
Heil 1R 0.26 (61.5) 0.18–0.33
Heil 2R 0.25 (60.9) 0.17–0.32

Vigorous Intensity

Puyau 0.27 (84.8) 0.17–0.37
Heil 1R 0.34 (85.8) 0.23–0.44
Heil 2R 0.31 (85.2) 0.20–0.41