Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 5;16(3):e14941. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.14941

Table 3. Socioeconomic Correlate of Sexual Function a, b, c.

Model 1 P Value Model 2 P Value Model 3 P Value
Subjects in model, No. 420 420 420
Model R d 0.29 0.34 0.33
Variables in model d
MD -0.08 ± 0.04 0.027 -0.03 ± 0.05 0.501 0.05 ± 0.07 0.439
Sex frequency 0.29 ± 0.45 0.511 0.14± 0.46 0.751 -0.37 ± 0.51 0.471
PR 2.02 ± 0.37 < 0.0001 2.12 ± 0.39 < 0.0001 1.93 ± 0.41 < 0.0001
Number of children -0.59 ± 0.43 0.172 -0.52 ± 0.45 0.249
Educational status 0.34 ± 0.70 0.623 -0.19 ± 0.74 0.788
Partner educational status -0.23 ± 0.58 0.693 0.04 ± 0.60 0.941
Working outside 1.20 ± 1.48 0.422 0.66 ± 1.69 0.691
Family income < -0.0001 ± 0.000 0.722 < 0.0001 ± 0.00 0.681
Age - - - - -0.17 ± 0.09 0.071
DD - - - - -0.01 ± 0.006 0.102
SBP - - - - -0.05 ± 0.02 0.051

a Abbreviations: PR, partner relationship.

b All data are presented in Mean ± SD.

c Multivariate linear regression models.

d Parameter estimate.