TABLE IV.
System performance (%) after the implementation of the two-step post-processing step
| Number of frames smoothed | Number of adjacent frames needed to classify a label | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T=0 | T=1 | T=2 | T=3 | |
| L=0 | 95.25 | 96.17 | 96.05 | 95.80 |
| L =1 | 97.13 | 97.68 | 97.39 | 97.26 |
| L =2 | 97.62 | 98.84 | 98.31 | 98.01 |
| L =3 | 96.56 | 97.22 | 97.09 | 96.98 |