Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jul 18;19(18):4917–4924. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1972

Figure 1. Known Signaling Pathways of Selected Checkpoint Molecules and Current Therapeutics.

Figure 1

Upon binding B7-1 or B7-2, CTLA-4 recruits the phosphatases SHP2 and PP2A via the YVKM motif in its cytoplasmic domain. SHP2 recruitment results in attenuation of TCR signaling by dephosphorylating the CD3ζ chain. PP2A recruitment results in downstream dephosphorylation of AKT, further dampening the T cell activation pathway. PD-1 ligation by PD-L1 or PD-L2 also recruits SHP2 to the ITIM domain, resulting in membrane proximal decreases in TCR signaling. LAG-3 signaling is dependent on interaction with its ligand, MHC II, as well as its intracellular KIEELE domain. TIM-3 binds to Galectin-9, as well as other ligands. In the absence of ligand binding, TIM-3 is associated with Bat3, protecting the cell from TIM-3 mediated inhibition and allowing for greater activation. However, once TIM-3 binds to Galectin-9, Y265 is phosphorylated and the interaction with Bat3 is disrupted, allowing TIM-3 to deliver inhibitory signals to the T cell. BTLA and CD160 bind to Herpes Virus Entry Mediator (HVEM). BTLA contains an intracellular ITIM domain that may be important in signaling. 2B4 binds to CD48, but further signaling mechanisms are poorly understood. Ig domains are depicted in orange, mucin domains in green, cysteine rich domains in brown, and GPI anchors are depicted as bolded black lines.

Current therapeutics to block checkpoint signaling molecules include both monoclonal antibodies and Ig fusion proteins. 1) Anti-CTLA-4: Ipilimumab (BMS-734016), Tremelimumab (CP-675,206) 2) Anti-PD-1: Nivolumab (BMS-936558, MDX1106), Lambrolizumab (MK-3475), CT-011 3) Anti PD-L1: BMS-936559 (MDX1105), MEDI4736 4) PD-L2 Ig: AMP224 5) LAG-3 Ig: IMP321