Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 30;9(4):e95746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095746

Table 2. Effect of captive rearing on song structure in Hylophylax naevioides, where song is defined by PC1, PC2 and PC3 (mean ± SD).

Variable Captive-reared Wild song X2 * P
PC1 −0.19±2.57 0.03±3.25 0.01 0.93
PC2 −1.03±1.60 0.16±2.44 1.14 0.29
PC3 −0.59±0.85 0.09±1.04 2.28 0.13

*Statistics derive from a Kruskal Wallis test; N1 = 5 captive-reared birds, N2 = 32 wild birds (sexes pooled).