Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2010 Sep 29;55(20):6141–6155. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/007

Figure 6.

Figure 6

ICD at four distinct acoustic pressures using (a) transducer-A or (b) transducer-B. ICD was quantified as the area under the VRMS curve from 0.095 ms to 0.145 ms, at each pressure. The signal used for quantification was from a focused hydrophone. For transducer-A, the ICD at 0.45 MPa and 0.60 MPa was significantly higher than at 0.15 MPa and 0.30 MPa (*P < 0.05). For transducer-B, the ICD at 0.60 MPa was significantly higher than at 0.30 MPa and 0.15 MPa. The ICD at 0.45 MPa was also significantly higher than 0.15 MPa (* denotes P < 0.05).