Skip to main content
. 2004 May;48(5):1904–1907. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1904-1907.2004

TABLE 2.

Pharmacokinetic parameters for indinavir and low-dose ritonavir for 14 children in this study and comparisons with those for historical controlsa

Value Value for parameter:
AUC0-24 Cmax Cmin Tmax
Indinavir
    Geometric mean for 14 patients in this study 92.9 (75.4-114.5) 8.6 (7.3-10.1) 0.63 (0.40-1.0) 2.8 (1.8-3.1)
    GMR of parameter for this study to that for two previous protocolsb 1.8 (1.5-2.3)* 1.1 (0.97-1.4) 8.4 (5.3-13.4)* NA
    GMR of parameter for this study to that for Merck protocol 021c 1.8 (1.4-2.2)* 1.2 (0.99-1.4) 4.9 (3.1-7.9)* NA
    GMR of parameter for this study to that for a previous studyd 1.1 (0.87-1.3) 0.80 (0.68-0.94)* 0.96 (0.60-1.5) ND
Ritonavir
    Geometric mean for 14 patients in this study 76.8 (61.0-96.7) 6.0 (4.7-7.8) 1.1 (0.84-1.6) 3.6 (1.5-4.2)
    GMR of parameter for this study to that for a previous studyd 3.8 (3.0-4.8)* 2.9 (2.2-3.7)* 3.2 (2.4-4.3)* ND
a

For AUC0-24, Cmax, and Cmin, ranges in parentheses are 90% confidence intervals; for Tmax (time to minimum concentration of drug in serum), ranges in parentheses are interquartile ranges. GMR, geometric mean ratio; NA, not available; ND, not determined; *, statistically significant.

b

Combined protocols Merck 068 and PACTG395, involving 500 mg of indinavir/m2 q8h in children.

c

Merck protocol 021 involved 800 mg of indinavir q8h in adults.

d

The study by Arnaiz et al. (2), involving 800 mg of indinavir plus 100 mg of ritonavir q12h in adults.