Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Oct 30;43(9):1498–1512. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0049-8

Table 1.

Descriptive Information for the Dependent and Independent Variables

Mean SD Min-Max
Dependent Variables
  Any past month TAM Youth reports of any use of tobacco, alcohol, or marijuana in the past month (wave 2) .18 .38 0–1
  Any past year violence Youth reports of perpetration of any of 7 violent behaviors in the past year (wave 2) .30 .46 0–1
  Variety of past month TAM Number of substances (tobacco, alcohol or marijuana) used in the past month (wave 2) .30 .72 0–3
  Variety of past year violence Number of 7 violent behaviors perpetrated in the past year (wave 2) .50 .95 0–6
Neighborhood Variables
  Collective efficacy Three-level item response model based on 10 indicators of social cohesion and informal social control reported by adult residents in the Community Survey (1995–1996) −.00 .22 −.46–.64
  Concentrated disadvantage Principal components factor analysis using three items (alpha=.81) from the 1990 Census: the percentage of residents below poverty, households receiving public assistance, and residents unemployed −.00 1.01 −1.51–2.35
Individual-Level Variables
  Exposure to violence Number of 14 violent acts witnessed or experienced by youth in the past year (wave 2) 2.04 2.13 0–11
  Age Youth's age in years (wave 1) 11.91 2.41 7.77–16.38
  Male Dichotomous variable indicating youth is male (wave 1) .51 .50 0–1
  Caucasian Dichotomous variable indicating youth is Caucasian (wave 1) .14 .35 0–1
  Hispanic Dichotomous variable indicating youth is Hispanic (wave 1) .48 .50 0–1
  African American Dichotomous variable indicating youth is African American (wave 1) .34 .47 0–1
  Other race/ethnicity Dichotomous variable indicating youth is of another race/ethnicity (wave 1) .04 .19 0–1
  Socioeconomic status Princip al components factor analysis of 3 items (alpha=.42) reported by caregivers at waves 1 or 2: household income, education of both parents, caregivers' employment status. .16 .99 −1.67–2.11
  Low self-control Standardized summed scale of 17 items (alpha=.75) reported by caregivers related to youth's inhibitory control, decision-making, sensation seeking, and persistence (Buss & Plomin, 1975; Gibson, Sullivan, Jones, & Piquero, 2010) at wave one. −.02 .99 −2.52–3.40
  Routine activities Standardized summed scale of 4 items (alpha=.58) rating youth reports of their engaging in unstructured, unsupervised activities (e.g., hanging out with peers and going to parties). (Osgood, Wilson, O'Malley, Bachman, & Johnston, 1996) at wave two. .01 1.00 −2.50–2.34
  Curfew Sum of caregivers' reports that children had to sleep at home on school nights, had a curfew on school nights, and had a curfew on weekend nights (3 items; alpha=.60; wave two). 2.86 .46 0–3
  Family social support Standardized summed scale of 6 items (alpha=.67) rating youth agreement with items like “my family….will always be there for me” (Turner, Frankel, & Levin, 1983) at wave one. .03 .95 −5.42–.81
  Peer social support Standardized, summed scale of 9 items (alpha=.70) rating youth agreement with items such as “I have at least one friend I could tell anything to” (Turner et al., 1983) at wave one. .03 .99 −3.97–1.34
  Peer drug use Standardized summed scale reflecting the number of friends reported by youth who used marijuana, alcohol, and tobacco in the past year (4 items; alpha=0.85; wave two). −.03 .99 −.73–4.79
  Perceptions of drug harmfulness Standardized summed scale of 7 items (alpha=.76) in which youth reported “how much people would hurt themselves” if they regularly used tobacco, alcohol and marijuana .01 .99 −4.47–1.52
  Any prior TAM use (National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, 1991) at wave two. Dichotomous variable; youth reports of any past year tobacco, alcohol, marijuana use (wave one) .18 .39 0–1
  Peer delinquency Standardized summed scale based on youth reports of the number of their friends who engaged in 11 delinquent acts (alpha=.085) in the past year (wave two). −.04 .95 −1.11–4.82
  Any prior violence Dichotomous variable; youth reports of any of 7 violent acts in the past year (wave one). .33 .47 0–1

Note: The descriptives are based on 1,718 individuals from 79 neighborhoods clusters.