Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Oct 30;43(9):1498–1512. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0049-8

Table 2.

The Association Between Exposure to Violence, Neighborhood Characteristics, and Any Past Month Tobacco, Alcohol, and Marijuana (TAM) Use and Any Past Year Violence, and Cross-Level Interactions

Any Past Month TAM Use
(N=1661)
Any Past Year Violence
(N=1718)

b SE b SE

Intercept 2.55** .11 1.15** .07
Exposure to violence .26** .04 .46** .03
Age .40** .05 .02 .03
Male −.07 .19 .20 .13
Hispanica −.49 .30 −.16 .21
African Americana −.91** .28 .51* .23
Other race/ethnicitya −.90 .50 −.43 .34
Socioeconomic status .04 .09 .01 .08
Low self-control −.01 .08 .20* .08
Routine activities .47** .10 .28** .08
Curfew −.12 .13 −.09 .13
Family social support −.05 .09 −.01 .06
Peer social support .18 .09 −.06 .07
Peer drug use .15 .09 -- --
Perceptions of drug harmfulness −.52** .08 -- --
Any prior TAM use 1.01** .22 -- --
Peer delinquency -- -- .07 .06
Any prior violence -- -- .92** .14
χ2 66.25 78.09
Direct Neighborhood Effects
Level-1 intercept −2.55** .001 −1.15** .01
Collective efficacy .01 .01 .08 .04
Concentrated disadvantage .001 .001 .004 .01
R2 .03 .05
Cross-Level Interactions
Exposure to violence .27** .001 .46** .001
  x Collective efficacy −.01 .01 .001 .003
R2 .02 .002
**

p ≤ .01

*

p ≤ .05

Notes: Individual-level results are based on Bernoulli models; italicized coefficients indicate that the effect of exposure to violence was allowed to vary randomly across the79 neighborhood clusters; all other variables were fixed across neighborhoods. The level-two and cross-level interaction results are based on Bernoulli models using Empirical Bayes (EB) estimates. Cross-level interactions control for the direct effects of the neighborhood characteristics and all individual-level variables.

a

Caucasian is the reference group