Table 2.
Any Past Month TAM Use (N=1661) |
Any Past Year Violence (N=1718) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
b | SE | b | SE | ||
Intercept | −2.55** | .11 | −1.15** | .07 | |
Exposure to violence | .26** | .04 | .46** | .03 | |
Age | .40** | .05 | .02 | .03 | |
Male | −.07 | .19 | .20 | .13 | |
Hispanica | −.49 | .30 | −.16 | .21 | |
African Americana | −.91** | .28 | .51* | .23 | |
Other race/ethnicitya | −.90 | .50 | −.43 | .34 | |
Socioeconomic status | .04 | .09 | .01 | .08 | |
Low self-control | −.01 | .08 | .20* | .08 | |
Routine activities | .47** | .10 | .28** | .08 | |
Curfew | −.12 | .13 | −.09 | .13 | |
Family social support | −.05 | .09 | −.01 | .06 | |
Peer social support | .18 | .09 | −.06 | .07 | |
Peer drug use | .15 | .09 | -- | -- | |
Perceptions of drug harmfulness | −.52** | .08 | -- | -- | |
Any prior TAM use | 1.01** | .22 | -- | -- | |
Peer delinquency | -- | -- | .07 | .06 | |
Any prior violence | -- | -- | .92** | .14 | |
χ2 | 66.25 | 78.09 | |||
Direct Neighborhood Effects | |||||
Level-1 intercept | −2.55** | .001 | −1.15** | .01 | |
Collective efficacy | .01 | .01 | .08 | .04 | |
Concentrated disadvantage | .001 | .001 | .004 | .01 | |
R2 | .03 | .05 | |||
Cross-Level Interactions | |||||
Exposure to violence | .27** | .001 | .46** | .001 | |
x Collective efficacy | −.01 | .01 | .001 | .003 | |
R2 | .02 | .002 |
p ≤ .01
p ≤ .05
Notes: Individual-level results are based on Bernoulli models; italicized coefficients indicate that the effect of exposure to violence was allowed to vary randomly across the79 neighborhood clusters; all other variables were fixed across neighborhoods. The level-two and cross-level interaction results are based on Bernoulli models using Empirical Bayes (EB) estimates. Cross-level interactions control for the direct effects of the neighborhood characteristics and all individual-level variables.
Caucasian is the reference group