Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Neurol. 2013 Dec 18;13(2):167–177. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70282-5

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis of the change in titers in CSF (A) and serum (B)

A. CSF p Estimate 95% CI

Outcome Good 0.049 129 75 221
Poor 340 158 735
Tumor No 0.0079 110 57 213
Yes 395 211 750
time point First < 0.0001 614 347 1086
Intermediate 198 118 330
Last 76 46 125
interactions
tumor * time point 0.058 tumor no tumor
First 1054 469 2368 358 161 796
Intermediate 305 147 633 129 62 268
Last 194 96 395 29 14 60
outcome * tumor 0.60
outcome * time point 0.55
outcome * tumor * time point 0.45
B. serum p Estimate 95% CI
Outcome Good 0.0025 1243 655 2334
Poor 7370 3119 17243
Tumor No 0.024 1644 785 3447
Yes 5515 2684 11443
time point First < 0.0001 5460 2908 10149
Intermediate 3214 1091 5515
Last 1564 921 2684
interactions
tumor * time point 0.18
outcome * tumor 0.21
outcome * time point 0.42
outcome * tumor * time point 0.13

The ln (titer) was used to correct for skewing. After creation of the best fitting model, recalculation of the estimated titer (and confidence interval) was performed; therefore the confidence interval is skewed. CSF cerebrospinal fluid; CI confidence interval