Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jan;7(1):190–197. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000553

Table 2.

Role of CMR in informing the decision for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Criteria based on CMR are marked with (*)

Indications for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired TOF or similar physiology with moderate or severe pulmonary regurgitation (regurgitation fraction ≥25%)
  1. Asymptomatic patient with 2 or more of the following criteria:
    1. *RV end-diastolic volume index >150 ml/m2 or Z-score >4. In patients whose body surface area falls outside published normal data: RV/LV end-diastolic volume ratio >2
    2. *RV end-systolic volume index >80 ml/m2
    3. *RV ejection fraction <47%
    4. *LV ejection fraction <55%
    5. *Large RVOT aneurysm
    6. QRS duration >140 ms
    7. Sustained tachyarrhythmia related to right heart volume load
    8. Other hemodynamically significant abnormalities:
      1. RVOT obstruction with RV systolic pressure ≥2/3 systemic
      2. Severe branch pulmonary artery stenosis (<30% flow to affected lung) not amenable to transcatheter therapy
      3. ≥Moderate tricuspid regurgitation
      4. Left-to-right shunt from residual atrial or ventricular septal defects with pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio ≥1.5
      5. Severe aortic regurgitation
      6. Severe aortic dilatation (diameter >5 cm or progressive dilatation >0.5 cm/year)37
  2. Symptoms and signs attributable to severe RV volume load documented by CMR or alternative imaging modality, fulfilling ≥1 of the quantitative criteria detailed above. Examples of symptoms and signs include:
    1. Exercise intolerance not explained by extra-cardiac causes (e.g., lung disease, musculoskeletal anomalies, genetic anomalies, obesity), with documentation by exercise testing with metabolic cart (≤70% predicted peak VO2 for age and gender not explained by chronotropic incompetence)
    2. Signs and symptoms of heart failure (e.g., dyspnea with mild effort or at rest not explained by extra-cardiac causes, peripheral edema)
    3. Syncope attributable to arrhythmia
  3. Special considerations
    1. Due to higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes in patients who underwent TOF repair at age ≥3 years,39 PVR may be considered if fulfill ≥1 of the quantitative criteria in section I
    2. Women with severe PR and RV dilatation and/or dysfunction may be at risk for pregnancy-related complications.40 Although no evidence is available to support benefit from pre-pregnancy PVR, the procedure may be considered if fulfilling ≥1 of the quantitative criteria in section I

Adapted from Geva T.2