Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2013 Nov 15;29(2):223–229. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.003

Table 3.

Results of planned contrasts for plantar loading variables at five forefoot regions (Data represents p values for group effects and for contrasts. Contrast values are not provided for non-significant differences at the group level)

Site Outcome Group
Effect
Partial Eta
Squared
Contrast
(DN vs.
DC)
Contrast
(DN vs.
HC)
Hallux PP .646 .025
PS .003 .277 .007 .002
STI .001 .367 .002 .001
PTI .031 .180 .011
Lesser Toes PP .447 .045
PS .598 .029
STI .213 .085
PTI .481 .041
Medial Forefoot PP .001 .358 .001 .001
PS .176 .095
STI .003 .285 .001 .006
PTI .001 .360 .001 .001
Central Forefoot PP .491 .040
PS .046 .161 .050
STI .001 .389 .002 .001
PTI .052 .156
Lateral Forefoot PP .015 .213 .004
PS .107 .120
STI .089 .129
PTI .001 .425 .002 .001