Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 4;30(9):1337–1343. doi: 10.1038/aps.2009.125

Table 1. Effect of formulation parameters on nanoparticulate characteristics.

Formulation parameters selection (blank NP)
pH 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0
Particle diameter (nm) 251.7±3.1 118.9±3.9 115.8±4.8
Yield (%) 89.7±3.1 86.2±2.2 73.2±3.2
Ethanol /BSA (v:v) 1.5:1 2.5:1 3:1 4:1 5:1
Particle diameter (nm) 112.2±3.5 251.7±5.1 335.5±6.2 337.0±7.1
Yield (%) 57.9±3.5 82.5±6.6 83.3±4.8 85.1±5.9 84.2±6.2
Cross-linking time 4 h 6 h 12 h 16 h 18 h
Particle diameter (nm) 124.5±3.2 136.7±5.5 165.6±6.9
Yield (%) 85.7±2.1 82.3±3.1 78.6±3.9
GEM loading methods selection    
  Direct loading Indirect adsorption Combination    
Particle diameter (nm) 312.6±5.4 267.6±5.1 305.7±7.3    
Encapsulation rate (%) 73.2±1.9 77.2±2.1 85.3±1.7    
Drug loading (%) 5.0±0.2 7.2±0.3 8.2±0.5    
Release time 12 h 3 h 12 h    
Single factor investigations
BSA concentration 1% 2% 3% 4%
Particle diameter (nm) 132.1±7.1 189.7±8.6 258.7±17.6
GEM concentration 10% 15% 20% 30%
Particle diameter (nm) 164.6±8.1 189.6±10.1 232.8±14.5 276.7±8.6
Glutaraldehyde 50% 100% 200% 300% 400%
Particle diameter (nm) 190.2±3.2 210.3±5.9 212.6±7.2 219.7±3.7
Yield (%) 82.1±1.2 88.7±1.9 86.7±0.8 78.2±0.9 74.1±1.7