Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 2.
Published in final edited form as: CSCW Conf Comput Support Coop Work. 2014:1523–1536. doi: 10.1145/2531602.2531607

Table 4. Accuracy of including different fields. We list each combination of fields, ordered by increasing MCAE.

Rank Fields MCAE success



1 lo tz tx ln 1823 100.0%
2 lo tz tx ds ln 1826 100.0%
3 lo tz 1862 87.7%
4 lo tz tx 1878 99.2%
5 lo tz tx ds 1908 99.6%
6 lo tz ds 2013 94.1%
7 lo tz ds ln 2121 100.0%
8 lo 2125 65.8%
9 lo tx ds ln 2176 100.0%
10 lo tz ln 2207 100.0%
11 lo tx ds 2274 99.2%
12 lo tx ln 2310 100.0%
13 lo tx 2383 98.0%
14 tz tx ds ln 2492 100.0%
15 lo ds 2585 88.3%
16 tz tx ds 2594 99.4%
17 tz tx ln 2617 100.0%
18 tz tx 2691 98.7%
19 lo ds ln 2759 100.0%
20 tz 2945 76.1%
21 tz ds 2991 91.8%
22 tz ds ln 3039 100.0%
23 lo ln 3253 100.0%
24 tx ds ln 3267 100.0%
25 tx ds 3426 98.8%
26 tz ln 3496 100.0%
27 tx ln 3685 100.0%
28 tx 3855 95.7%
29 ds 4482 79.7%
30 ds ln 4484 100.0%
31 ln 6143 100.0%