Skip to main content
. 2014 May 2;9(5):e91929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091929

Table 3. Comparison of the performances of PASTEC, REPCLASS, and TECLASS for classification to TE order level.

Dataset (sequence #) Performance PASTEC PASTEC mapped to REPCLASS order (1) PASTEC mapped to TECLASS order (2) REPCLASS (3) TECLASS (4)
Repbase-atha (318)
Well classified 71.4 79.7 93.7 85.5 97.5
Misclassified 10.2 1.9 2.5 2.8 1.9
Not classified 18.4 18.4 3.8 11.6 0.6
Repbase-diff (5546)
Well classified 51.3 59.1 49.7 66.9 47.7
Misclassified 10.9 3.1 3.5 11.1 50.3
Not classified 33.4 33.4 46.8 17.6 1.9
Repbase-all (9665)
Well classified 22.4 31.9 8.6 12.4 40
Misclassified 15.8 6.2 6.7 33.3 59.7
Not classified 61.8 61.8 84.7 50.84 0.25

Note that the classification differs between the three tools. We therefore mapped the PASTEC classification results onto those for REPCLASS (1) and TECLASS (2). (2) Mapped onto TECLASS class I orders only. (3) order considered are: DNA transposon, LTR retrotransposon, helitron, non LTR retrotransposon. (4) order considered are only LTR, LINE/SINE.