Abstract
Declining soil fertility and farm productivity is a major global concern in order to achieve food security for a burgeoning world population. It is reported that improving soil health alone can increase productivity by 10–15% and in combination with efficient plant traits, farm productivity can be increased up to 50–60%. In this article we explore the emerging microbial and bioengineering technologies, which can be employed to achieve the transformational increase in farm productivity and can simultaneously enhance environmental outcomes i.e., low green house gas (GHG) emissions. We argue that metagenomics, meta-transcriptomics and metabolomics have potential to provide fundamental knowledge on plant-microbes interactions necessary for new innovations to increase farm productivity. Further, these approaches provide tools to identify and select novel microbial/gene resources which can be harnessed in transgenic and designer plant technologies for enhanced resource use efficiencies.
Keywords: transgenic plants, designer plants, microbes, metagenomics, farm productivity
Introduction: Food Security, Soil Health and Resource Use Efficiency
Securing food security for an increasing world population is major challenge. It is estimated that by 2050, food production needs to increase between 50−70%.1,2 The challenge for policy makers, farmers, scientists and agronomists is that this increase in food production needs to be achieved from available arable lands. However, soil fertility has been in decline globally due to intensification of farming, soil erosion and inappropriate use of agrochemicals and heavy machinery. The pressure on arable land differs between developed and developing countries.3 In developed countries for example, national food security is not a major concern but pressure on arable land for production of biofuels, mining and other industrial activities is prevalent. Additionally, there has been significant declines in the structure and fertility of much arable land in developed countries. As a result, further resource inputs do not results in yield gains across many farming regions.4 A recently observed phenomenon called multiple nutrient limitation has been identified as a major limiting factor on resource use efficiency in farms. For example, a lack of phosphorus (P) or potassium availability (resulting from chemical fixation into the top soil layers), can limit farm productivity due to its negative impact on N use efficiency.5 Additional major challenges in developing countries, lie in substantially increasing yield quality and quantity without further increase in farming cost and detrimental environmental impacts.
Soil security is a critical component for food security but also for sustaining living terrestrial ecosystems. Soil quality/ health has been defined as the capacity of a specific kind of soil to perform functions within natural or managed ecosystem boundaries to sustain biological productivity, promote environmental quality and maintain plant and animal health.6 Low input or organic farming in some areas are critical and necessary for economic and social reasons. In such systems, the role of microbes in nutrient availability for plant growth and resistance against disease and pests is of vital importance.
Conventional farming practice remains one of the major approaches to increase crop productivity. However recent evidence suggest declining or stagnating yields in many areas,7,8 and the sustainability of such practices has been questioned. Undoubtedly the situation is likely to become exacerbated due to limited availability of P fertilizers and increasing costs associated with mining less productive sites for commercial P acquisition. Further uncertainty is expected due to inevitable changes in climate, precipitation patterns and the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events. Soil physico-chemical and biological environments are key factors for primary productivity, and through their interactions, these factors modulate farm profitability. Key components of productive soils vary greatly depending on soil type, regional climate conditions, types of crops grown and agronomic practices employed. None the less common attributes necessary to maintain productive soils include increasing soil C contents, enhancing water/ nutrient holding capacities, increasing water filtration rates, minimizing erosions and providing healthy habitats for beneficial organisms.9
Improved resource (water and nutrient) use efficiency is key for productive and profitable farming. Current resource use efficiency is very low in farming systems. For example, nitrogen (N) and P use efficiency is considered below 50% and 30% of total inputs respectively.10 Global annual consumption of P fertiliser is 30 M tones and world resources of good quality P is estimated to be exhausted in 80 y.11 It is obvious that increasing resource use efficiency will save cost and improve environmental benefits by reducing GHG emissions and leaching losses, thus improving soil and water quality. One of the major key constraints in resource use efficiency is ability of soils to hold resources (water and nutrients) in the form that is available for plant uptake. It is postulated that use of appropriate technologies and management practices can substantially increase the productivity. For example, it is believed that increasing soil health alone can increase productivity by 10−15% which, in combination with better plant traits, can increase farm productivity up to 60%.3,37 In this article, we explore emerging biotechnological approaches which increase soil productivity and can contribute to food security by improving availability of resources and resource use efficiency for plants.
One of the major constraints of resource use efficiency includes availability of nutrients for plant uptake. Nutrients applied to crops undergo biotic and abiotic transformation and become less available for plant uptake. For example, applied N fertilizers (urea/ ammonium based) are utilized by microbes as a substrate for nitrification and denitrification.12 This can result in a significant amount of applied-N being immobilized, leached as nitrate into water bodies (causing eutrophication) or released into the atmosphere as N2O, a potent GHG. Similarly applied P fertilizers are distributed into different pools and the majority of this becomes unavailable for plant uptake.13 Unlike N, there is no biological fixation of phosphorus or losses to the atmosphere, but it gets chemically fixed in clay and organic particles within soil and becomes unavailable for plant uptake.
Harnessing Plant-Microbes Interactions for Transgenic Technologies
In natural ecosystem, plant-microbe interactions are key for primary productivity. Plants release carbon (C) in the form of rhizodeposits which are utilized by microbial communities for growth and activity. Microbes, in turn, provide other essential nutrients (primarily N and P) through atmospheric fixation of N2 or mineralization of organic matter. There are number of symbiotic and free-living microbes which are known to enhance nutrient availability to plants. A few common example for symbiotic interactions include, rhizobia-legume nodule symbiosis associated with N2-fixation and plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi interaction associated with phosphorus acquisitions.14 There are numerous free-living microbes inhabiting the rhizosphere which fix atmospheric N215,16 and solubilise P13 for plant uptake. Some bacteria and fungi (mainly mycorrhiza) enhance availability of P to plant from organic and fixed P by mineralization and solubilisation. Additionally, microbes can enhance P acquisition and availability by promoting root growth. Previous studies have demonstrated incorporation of P acquisition by inoculating P-solubilising microbes.17,18 Additionally, arbuscular mychorhizal fungi are known to enhance plant P use efficiency by foraging soil P over greater volume of soil due to vast hyphal networks.
Previous works have highlighted approaches to harness microbe-rhizosphere interactions for increased farm productivity,19-21 but how these interactions could be exploited for biotechnological applications is not fully known. Rhizosphere-microbial interactions are modulated by a number of chemicals produced by plant roots to communicate with soil microbes. Identifying these signal molecules and harnessing them to improve interaction between beneficial microbes and plant roots can improve resource availability and use efficiency. One such mechanism is to genetically modify plants to enhance plant-microbial signaling which can serve this purpose. Transgenic plants which encourage colonization and persistence of beneficial microbes through altered root exudation has been suggested as an effective approach.22
Nitrogen fertilizers remain the major limiting resource in crop productivity and the main cost to farming. Transgenic technologies can be used to reduce N inputs by two potential approaches: (1) Genetic engineering of non-legume crops to form N2 fixing nodules with Rhizobia, resulting in N acquisition through N2 fixation.23 However, nodule formation in legumes involves a complex signaling dialog between plant and rhizobia to initiate colonization, nodule formation and N2 fixation. Each step is mediated by multiple genes and therefore successful transfer of nodule forming ability in non-legume crops requires a complete understanding of interactions between multiple (several dozen) plant and bacterial genes.9 Rapidly growing omics technologies will help greatly in understanding this complex series of interactions in the future. However, our current technological ability to successfully engineer such complex traits is limited. (2) Another potential approach to increase N availability to plants includes engineering crops with N- fixing (nif) genes. Nif genes encode nitorgenase enzyme, a key enzyme in the fixation of N2, and are distributed in a number of free-living and symbiotic bacteria. However, successful engineering of nif genes in crops plants will require a fuller understanding of the interactions between different genes and N2 fixing biochemistry. For example, the nitrogenase enzyme needs protection against oxygen for its activity. It has been suggested that nif genes could be inserted and expressed in cell organelles such as chloroplast and mitochondria due to their similarity with bacterial cells.24,25 However, there are still huge technical challenges to overcome before this can be successfully achieve. For example, at least 10 different genes need to be transferred into plants in order to achieve N2 fixation. Before the effectiveness of these approaches can be realized, a fuller understanding of the complexity of different gene interactions is needed.
Similarly, conceptually plants can be engineered with some P mineralizing/ solubilising genes from soil bacteria. Several plants already contain acid phosphotase enzymes for P-solubilisation, but it can be envisage that alkaline phosphatase and phytase genes can be harnessed through transgenic technologies so that crops can directly access organic/ fixed phosphorus and thus improve access to P. Some success in transferring phytase and phosphatase genes in transgenic plants have been reported.26,27 Currently however, no evidence is available to evaluate the success and effectiveness of such an approach at commercial scale and the challenges remain similar as those for transfer of N2 fixing genes.
Although the use of transgenic expression of bacterial genes in plants to improve N and P efficiencies has yet to be fully realized, promise can be taken from other examples where soil bacteria have been the major source of genes for transgenic technologies. Perhaps the two most successful examples of transgenic plants harnessed world-wide for pest management and herbicide resistance genes, contains genes from soil bacteria, Bacillus thurengeneisis and Agrobacterium strain CP4, respectively.28-30 One of the limitations of current technologies is availability of simple genetic systems, which can be successfully transferred into plants. Soil microbes are a huge source of genetic resources but most of them (> 99%) are uncultivable under current laboratory conditions.31 Recent advances in omics technologies offer a huge potential to uncover and harness novel genetic resources from soil microbes. Using metagenomics, proteomics, metabolomics and transcriptomics, it is now possible to identify mechanisms and isolate genetic resources for maximizing nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency without cultivating soil microbes22 (Fig. 1). For example, metagenomics can provide key information on new genetic resources for novel traits in soils. Genes then can be either isolated or synthesized and be used for transgenic application. Additionally, metagenomics along with traditional measures of soil physico-chemical properties could also be used to determine the soil ability to provide nutrients for crops under low-input farming, fertilizer-use efficiency under conventional faming, and when combined with predictive modeling can forecast the future outbreak of disease and weeds under conservation farming systems. Such knowledge will form the strong basis to define productive and healthy soils. Where soil health has been compromised, metagenomics can be used to identify the type of intervention required to restore soil health. For example, if soil productivity is compromised due to loss of organic matter, supplementation with compost, green waste, cover crop etc. can be implemented. Similarly, if the soil productivity was compromised due to multiple-nutrient limitation, introduction of bioinoculants such as P-solubilising microbes, free living/ symbiotic N-fixing microbes, transgenic/ designer plants along with other agronomic measures i.e., precision technology, soil pH management can be used to restore land productivity.
Figure 1. A diagram to illustrate how emerging technologies can help in improving both transgenic and designer plant approaches for increased farm productivity. Metagenomics (study of genetic material recovered directly from the environment) can be used to examine the genetic potential of soil communities and sequences can be harnessed to isolate genes for bioengineering of plants/bacteria. Metatranscriptomics (study of expression of genetic materials directly from the environment) and metaproteomics (study of all proteins recovered directly from the environment) will provide information on the activities of soil communities at the time of sampling and will provide fundamental understanding of ecosystem functioning. This information, in combination with new culture and genomics approaches can then be harnessed for increasing farm productivity.
Harnessing Plant-Microbes Interactions for Designer Plants
Potentially it is possible to manipulate microbial activity in the rhizosphere to maximize the availability of nutrients for plant uptake. One such approach is development of better root traits in crops which can access different zones in soils for nutrient/ water uptake. More importantly, root traits which can promote/ attract beneficial microbes such as mycorrhiza, P-solubilising, N2-fixing and plant growth promoting bacteria can have direct positive impacts on farm productivity. These associations are well documented for their positive impact on plant growth and yield.32 However, constraints include practicability of such approaches and success in field conditions where inoculated microbes have to compete with indigenous soil bacteria for space and resource available in the rhizosphere. These constraints can, to a certain extent, be overcome by a novel approach termed “Designer Plants.”33 Although this technology is currently evaluated for multi-purpose bioremediation,22 it could be harnessed to increase farm productivity by enhancing resource availability and use efficiency. The designer plant exploits the strength and interactions between plants, rhizosphere bacteria, fungi and endophytical bacteria. Plant traits (achieved either via conventional or transgenic breeding) which preferentially attract N2 fixing bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi and P solubilising bacteria on roots for accessing organic N and P can be manipulated with endosymbionts that fix N2 inside plant tissues. There are a number of endophytic bacteria which can fix atmospheric N2 e.g species of Bulkholderia, Bacillus, Azosprillium, Beijerinkia, Pseudomonas, etc.34 There is evidence that inoculated entophytes (Klebsiellas pneumonniae 342) had provided up to 44% N2 in inoculated wheat.35 If all the above approaches are combined in the designer plant approach and technology could be developed to produce seeds/ seedlings needed for farm application, this technology can have significant impacts on farm productivity. Before such technology can be applied to the field, significant challenge remains in developing large-scale technologies. While seed dressing have been successfully used before in transferring beneficial rhizosphere microbes in the field, introducing viable endophytes in seeds requires further refinement of the technology.36 There is a need of knowledge and technology to make sure that seed applied microbes remain competitive in soils against indigenous microbes and form strong association with growing plants.
Conclusion
Achieving food security for the growing world population requires scientific breakthroughs and technology developments at many fronts. Enhancing soil productivity through better resource availability and use efficiency in arable soils is one of those key challenges. Transgenic technologies have already served well in several farming regions but focus of this technology has been mainly for pest management. Developing transgenic plants to improve resource-use efficiency is scientifically more challenging because these traits seems to be multigenic and post translation products needs bacterial cell environment for activity. However, there is a strong concept available (transfer of N2-fixing genes) and efforts are being made in this direction. However, it may take several years, and even decades, before such technologies could be implemented for field application. It can be argued that the designer plant approach may have better applicability in the shorter term. Technologies for seed dressing with beneficial microbial spores are well-established. If a successful technology for introducing endophytic bacteria in seeds at a commercial scale can be achieved, this technology may serve well in the effort to secure improved resource use efficiency. To achieve this, concerted effort is needed between plant and microbial scientists, agronomists and engineers. Social and economic constraints also need to be addressed. Success in this direction will not only improve farm productivity and profitability but improve soil, air and water quality, relying less on external inputs so that proportionally more will be utilized by plants, reducing environmental burden and stress on soil and ecosystems health.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the editor for invitation to write this article. BKS research in farm productivity is funded by Grain Research and Development Corporation (UWS00008) and Cotton Research and Development Corporation (UWS1301).
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
No potential conflict of interest was disclosed.
Footnotes
Previously published online: www.landesbioscience.com/journals/bioe/article/25320
References
- 1.WorldBank. World Development Report: Agriculture for Development. Washington DC, 2008.
- 2.Godfray HCJ, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Nisbett N, et al. The future of the global food system. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365:2769–77. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chen X-P, Cui Z-L, Vitousek PM, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Bai J-S, et al. Integrated soil-crop system management for food security. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:6399–404. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101419108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cassman KG, Grassini G, van Wart J. Crop Yield Potential, Yield Trends, and Global Food Security in a Changing Climate In: Hillel D, Rosenzweig C, eds. Handbook of Cimatic Change and Agroecosystems: Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation: ICP Series on Climate Change Impacts, Adaptaion and Mitigation, 2010:37-52. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bell M, Lester D. Observations on a general decline in fertility of multiple nutrients.: Grain Research and Development Corporation update paper, 2011.
- 6.Doran JW, Zeiss MR. Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol. 2000;15:3–11. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00067-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cassman KG. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:5952–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brisson N, Gate P, Gouache D, Charmet G, Oury F-X, Huard F. Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France. Field Crops Res. 2010;119:201–12. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.NRC. Emerging technologies to benefit farmers in sub-saharan Africa and South Asia. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Holford ICR. Soil phosphorus: Its measurement, and its uptake by plants. Aust J Soil Res. 1997;35:227–39. doi: 10.1071/S96047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Isherwood KF. Mineral fertilizer use and the environment. Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Inselsbacher E, Hinko-Najera Umana N, Stange FC, Gorfer M, Schueller E, Ripka K, et al. Short-term competition between crop plants and soil microbes for inorganic N fertilizer. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42:360–72. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Richardson AE, Simpson RJ. Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:989–96. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.van der Heijden MGA, Wagg C. Soil microbial diversity and agro-ecosystem functioning. Plant Soil. 2013;363:1–5. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1545-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Orr CH, Leifert C, Cummings SP, Cooper JM. Impacts of organic and conventional crop management on diversity and activity of free-living nitrogen fixing bacteria and total bacteria are subsidiary to temporal effects. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Venieraki A, Dimou M, Pergalis P, Kefalogianni I, Chatzipavlidis I, Katinakis P. The genetic diversity of culturable nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the rhizosphere of wheat. Microb Ecol. 2011;61:277–85. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9747-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jakobsen I, Chen BD, Munkvold L, Lundsgaard T, Zhu YG. Contrasting phosphate acquisition of mycorrhizal fungi with that of root hairs using the root hairless barley mutant. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28:928–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01345.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jakobsen I, Leggett ME, Richardson AE. Rhizosphere microorganisms and plant phosphorus uptake. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN, eds. Phosphorus, agriculture and the environment. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, 2005:437-94. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaymak HC. Potential of PGPR in Agricultural Innovations. In: Maheshwari DK, ed. Plant growth and health promoting bacteria, 2010:45-79. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Altomare C, Tringovska I. Beneficial soil microorganisms, an ecological alternative for soil fertility management. In Lichtfouse, E., eds. Genetics, Biofuels and Local Farming System. 2011: 161-214. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shen J, Li C, Mi G, Li L, Yuan L, Jiang R, et al. Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China. J Exp Bot. 2013;64:1181–92. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Abhilash PC, Powell JR, Singh HB, Singh BK. Plant-microbe interactions: novel applications for exploitation in multipurpose remediation technologies. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:416–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jones KM, Kobayashi H, Davies BW, Taga ME, Walker GC. How rhizobial symbionts invade plants: the Sinorhizobium-Medicago model. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5:619–33. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cheng Q, Day A, Dowson-Day M, Shen GF, Dixon R. The Klebsiella pneumoniae nitrogenase Fe protein gene (nifH) functionally substitutes for the chlL gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;329:966–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.02.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Frazzon APG, Ramirez MV, Warek U, Balk J, Frazzon J, Dean DR, et al. Functional analysis of Arabidopsis genes involved in mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster assembly. Plant Mol Biol. 2007;64:225–40. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9147-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tian J, Wang X, Tong Y, Chen X, Liao H. Bioengineering and management for efficient phosphorus utilization in crops and pastures. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23:866–71. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2012.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang Y, Ye X, Ding G, Xu F. Overexpression of phyA and appA genes improves soil organic phosphorus utilisation and seed phytase activity in Brassica napus. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60801–, e. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Romeis J, Meissle M, Bigler F. Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:63–71. doi: 10.1038/nbt1180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu KS. Biotech crops: Products, properties and prospects. Food Technol. 1999;53:42. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Funke T, Han H, Healy-Fried ML, Fischer M, Schönbrunn E. Molecular basis for the herbicide resistance of Roundup Ready crops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:13010–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603638103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Singh BK, Bardgett RD, Smith P, Reay DS. Microorganisms and climate change: terrestrial feedbacks and mitigation options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:779–90. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Singh BK, Millard P, Whiteley AS, Murrell JC. Unravelling rhizosphere-microbial interactions: opportunities and limitations. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12:386–93. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rayu S, Karpouzas DG, Singh BK. Emerging technologies in bioremediation: constraints and opportunities. Biodegradation. 2012;23:917–26. doi: 10.1007/s10532-012-9576-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.James EK. Nitrogen fixation in endophytic and associative symbiosis. Field Crops Res. 2000;65:197–209. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00087-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Iniguez AL, Dong YM, Triplett EW. Nitrogen fixation in wheat provided by Klebsiella pneumoniae 342. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004;17:1078–85. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.10.1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cummings SP. The application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in low input and organic cultivation of graminaceous crops; potential and problems. Environ Biotechnol. 2009;5:43–50. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fan M, Shen J, Yuan L, Jiang R, Chen X, Davies WJ, et al. Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:13–24. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

