Skip to main content
. 2014 May 2;9(5):e94882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094882

Table 2. Nominally associated mtDNA SNPs in discovery and follow-up in confirmation.

Discovery Confirmation
SNP a MAF cases [%] b MAF controls [%] b Odds Ratio Confidence Interval c p-value d MAF cases [%] b MAF controls [%] b Odds Ratio Confidence Interval c p-value d
All n = 1,158 n = 435 n = 1,697 n = 2,373
m.8994G/A 1.30 3.92 0.32 0.15–0.69 0.002 3.24 2.41 1.36 0.92–2.02 0.120
Males n = 508 n = 171 n = 828 n = 930
m.8994G/A 0.79 2.94 0.26 0.05–1.23 0.048 2.78 2.16 1.30 0.68–2.51 0.441
m.11674C/T 0.59 3.51 0.16 0.03–0.78 0.010 2.06 1.63 1.27 0.63–2.56 0.593
Females n = 650 n = 264 n = 869 n = 1,443
m.4769A/G 3.38 0.76 4.60 1.12–40.6 0.022 2.99 2.36 1.28 0.76–2.15 0.348
m.8994G/A 1.69 4.55 0.36 0.14–0.91 0.019 3.68 2.57 1.45 0.87–2.41 0.132
m.12612A/G 8.00 2.88 0.58 0.36–0.95 0.023 10.60 9.01 1.20 0.90–1.59 0.216
m.13708G/A 9.12 13.69 0.61 0.38–0.98 0.040 10.87 12.81 1.08 0.83–1.42 0.238
a

mtDNA position according to rCRS [29].

b

MAF, minor allele frequency.

c

95% confidence of odds ratio for minor allele.

d

Fisher's exact test, two-sided, p-values below 0.05 are highlighted in bold.