Table 2.

Fit indices and model comparison for tested models

Model	Model fit				Model comparison
	χ 2	df	CFI	RMSEA	Comparison	Δχ 2	Δdf
Total
M1: Measurement model	449.92	58	0.92	0.057	–	–	–
M2: Direct effect model	635.40	60	0.88	0.068	M1–M2	185.48*	2
M3: Mediation model	449.92	58	0.92	0.057	M2–M3	185.48*	−2
M4: Final model	454.08	60	0.92	0.056	M3–M4	4.16	2
Women
M1: Measurement model	396.56	58	0.91	0.064	–	–	–
M2: Direct effect model	537.33	60	0.88	0.075	M1–M2	140.77*	2
M3: Mediation model	396.56	58	0.91	0.064	M2–M3	140.77*	−2
M4: Final model	397.91	60	0.91	0.063	M3–M4	1.35	2
Men
M1: Measurement model	102.78	58	0.95	0.049	–	–	–
M2: Direct effect model	154.30	60	0.89	0.07	M1–M2	51.52*	2
M3: Mediation model	102.78	58	0.95	0.049	M2–M3	51.52*	−2
M4: Final model	105.95	62	0.95	0.047	M3–M4	3.17	4

CFI comparative fit index, RMSEA root-mean-square error approximation

*p < 0.001