Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;123(4):796–803. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000188

Table 5.

Cases of Instrumental Delivery Compared to Cases of Direct Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery (where no instrument was applied)

Variable Odds Ratio (95% CI)
Birth weight (per 100g increase) 1.07 (1.05 – 1.09)*

Maternal age 1.03 (1.01 – 1.05)

Ethnicity - Caucasian Ref
Ethnicity - Black 0.81 (0.24 – 2.03)
Ethnicity – Southeast Asian 1.34 (0.86 – 2.00)
Ethnicity - Chinese 0.93 (0.35 – 2.21)
Ethnicity – other/unknown 0.88 (0.42 – 1.64)

Time at full dilation 0.1- (0.1 – 1.00)

Maternal BMI 1.00 (0.1 – 1.00)

Parity 1.08 (0.94 – 1.24)

Accoucheur 1.11 (0.95 – 1.30)

Delivery during daylight hours 0.86 (0.70 – 1.04)

Epidural anaesthesia 1.46 (1.18 – 1.81)*

Multivariate analysis was performed using a binomial logistic regression model. Model coefficients are expressed as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Levels of significance:

*

p<0.001;

p<0.01.

CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index.

Associations that meet the threshold for statistical significance (alpha-level = 0.05) are shown in boldface.