. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Exp Aging Res. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):332–356. doi: 10.1080/0361073X.2014.897150

Table 2.

Percentage of participants and items with reported retrieval use levels, by age, condition, and trial match.

	Yng_none	Yng_acc	Yng_rt	Yng_both	Old_none	Old_acc	Old_rt	Old_both
	% Participants, Intact
0 – 33 % ret	0	0	0	0	17.6	5.2	6.3	5.9
34 – 66 % ret	0	0	5	4.5	29.4	10.5	25	23.5
67 – 100 % ret	100	100	95	95.5	52.9	84.2	68.8	70.6
	% Participants, Rearranged
0 – 33 % ret	0	0	0	4.5	35.3	0	18.8	5.9
34 – 66 % ret	11.8	0	10	4.5	17.6	36.8	56.3	41.2
67 – 100 % ret	88.2	100	90	90.9	47.1	63.2	25	52.9
	% Items, Intact
0 – 33 % ret	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
34 – 66 % ret	0	0	0	0	0	8.3	8.3	0
67 – 100 % ret	100	100	100	100	100	91.7	91.7	100
	% Items, Rearranged
0 – 33 % ret	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
34 – 66 % ret	0	0	0	0	0	16.7	83.3	0
67 – 100 % ret	100	100	100	100	100	83.3	16.7	100

Notes. Conditions: none = no feedback, acc = accuracy feedback only, rt = speed feedback only, and both = both accuracy and speed feedback. % ret = reported percentage of retrieval use.