Skip to main content
. 2014 May 7;20(17):4900–4907. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.4900

Table 1.

Phase III randomized controlled trials showing oncological outcomes

Study and design Recurrence lap vs open
Survival lap vs open
Tumor location (cm from AV) Patient enrollment (n)
LN harvested (n) lap vs open CRM positivity lap vs open
DR LR DFS OS Open Lap
Liang et al[17] Single center N/A N/A N/A 76% vs 82.8% P = 0.46, (44 mo) N/A 174 169 7.1 vs 7.4 P = 0.47 N/A
Kang et al[18] "COREAN" Multicenter N/A N/A N/A N/A Lap-5.6 Open-5.3 170 170 17 vs 18 P = 0.08 5% vs 7% P = 0.77
Jayne et al[19] "CLASSIC" update Multicenter 21.9% vs 21.9% P = 0.86, (5 yr) 9.4% vs 7.6% P = 0.74, (5 yr) 53.2% vs 52.1% P = 0.95, (5 yr) 60.3% vs 52.9% P = 0.13, (5 yr) N/A 128 253 N/A N/A
Lujan et al[20] Single center N/A 4.8% vs 5.3% P = 0.78, (5 yr) 84.8% vs 81% P = 0.9, (5 yr) 72.1% vs 75.3% P = 0.98, (5 yr) Lap-5.5 Open-6.2 103 101 13.6 vs 11.6 P = 0.02 4% vs 3% P = 0.4
Ng et al[21] Single center 12.3% vs 18.1% P = 0.37, (10 yr) 7.1% vs 4.9% P = 0.68, (10 yr) 82.9% vs 80.4% P = 0.69, (10 yr) 83.5% vs 78% P = 0.59, (10 yr) 12-15 77 76 11.5 vs 12 P = 0.7 2.6% vs 1.3% P = 0.62
Ng et al[22] Single center 15% vs 25% P = 0.6, (5 yr) 5% vs 11% = 0.6, (5 yr) 78.1% vs 73.6% P = 0.55, (5 yr) 75.2% vs 76.5% P = 0.2, (5 yr) ≤ 5 48 51 12.4 vs 13 P = 0.72 5.8% vs 4.1% P = NS
Pechlivanides et al[23] Multicenter N/A N/A N/A N/A Lap-6 Open-8 39 34 19.2 vs 19.2 P = 0.2 N/A
Braga et al[24] Single center N/A 4% vs 5.3% P = 0.97 (5 yr) N/A No difference (5 yr) Lap-9.1 Open-8.6 85 83 12.7 vs 13.6 P = NA 1.3% vs 2.4% P = NA

AV: Anal verge; N/A: Not applicable; OS: Overall survival; DFS: Disease free survival; LR: Local recurrence; DR: Distant recurrence; LN: Lymph nodes; CRM: Circumferential margins; NS: Non-significant; NA: Not available.