Skip to main content
. 2014 May 7;20(17):4900–4907. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.4900

Table 2.

Meta-analyses showing oncological outcomes

Ref. Trials (n) Patients (n) OS lap vs open DFS lap vs open LR lap vs open LN harvested lap vs open (n) CRM positivity lap vs open
Huang et al[25] 6 1033 HR = 0.76, P = 0.11, 4 trials (3 yr) HR = 1.13, P = 0.64, 3 trials (3 yr) RR = 0.55, P = 0.21, 4 trials (3 yr) P = 0.43, 5 trials 7.94% vs 5.37%, P = 0.63, 5 trials (3 yr)
Ohtani et al[26] 12 2095 N/A OR = 1.17, P = 0.35 (5 yr) OR = 0.93, P = 0.61 (5 yr) P = NS P = NS
Anderson et al[27] 24 3158 72% vs 65%, P = NS, 13 trials (3 yr) N/A 7% vs 8%, P = NS, 16 trials (3 yr) 10 vs 11, P = 0.001 17 trials 5% vs 8%, P = NS, 10 trials (3 yr)
Aziz et al[28] 20 2071 N/A N/A N/A P = NS 9.5% vs 10.8%, OR = 0.93, P = 0.38

OS: Overall survival; DFS: Disease free survival; LR: Local recurrence; LN: Lymph nodes; CRM: Circumferential margins; HR: Hazard ratio; N/A: Not applicable; NS: Non-significant; OR: Odds ratio.