Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 4;306(9):E1013–E1024. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00553.2013

Table 2.

Effects of PCUN and PIUN on the expression of candidate miRs in the liver in singleton and twin fetal sheep in late gestation

Singletons
Twins
Predicted Target Protein
microRNA Control [mean expression (reads/million)] PCUN (fold change relative to controls) PIUN (fold change relative to controls) Control [mean expression (reads/million)] PCUN (fold change relative to controls) PIUN (fold change relative to controls) Protein nt match No. of matches
hsa-miR-142-5p (−1 isomir) 195 ×1.60↑ ×1.99↑ 250 ×0.63↓ ×0.60↓ IRS-2 7mer-1A 1
hsa-miR-493-3p 280 ×1.66↑ 436 p85 7mer-1A 1
hsa-miR-146b-5p 990 ×1.87↑ 1,061
hsa-miR-339-5p 10,779 ×0.80↓ ×0.80↓ 7,818
hsa-miR-148a-3p 11,494 ×0.76↓ 11,592 ×0.71↓
hsa-miR-19a-3p 13,193 ×0.72↓ 8,729
hsa-miR-19b-3p 28,477 ×0.66↓ 18,837
hsa-miR-30a-5p (+2 isomir) 41,451 ×0.76↓ 36,325 FOXO1 7mer-m8 1
Cav-1 7mer-1A 1
hsa-miR-30e-5p (−4 isomir) 25,165 ×0.80↓ 21,641
hsa-miR-122-5p 117,180 140,513 ×1.37↑ ×0.77↓
hsa-let-7a-5p 3,304 5,709 ×0.57↓ ×0.57↓ IRS-2 8mer 1
IR 8mer 1
Akt2 8mer 1
hsa-let-7b-5p 1,966 2,742 ×0.61↓ ×0.61↓ IRS-2 8mer 1
IR 8mer 1
Akt2 8mer 1
hsa-miR-130a-3p 139 155 ×0.63↓ ×0.66↓
hsa-miR-16-2-3p (−4 isomir) 207 200 ×0.40↓
hsa-miR-34c-5p 215 242 ×0.57↓
hsa-miR-106b-5p 8,734 6,137 ×1.68↑
hsa-let-7 g-5p (+1 isomir) 5,260 6,624 ×0.62↓
hsa-miR-335-5p 6,079 6,865 ×0.67↓
hsa-miR-379-3p (+3 isomir) 101 150 ×0.61↓
hsa-miR-369-3p 483 518 ×0.64↓
hsa-miR-34a-5p 595 560 ×0.67↓
hsa-miR-382-5p 147 154 ×0.64↓
hsa-miR-126-5p 11,447 10,243 ×0.77↓

PCUN, periconceptional undernutrition; PIUN, preimplantation undernutrition; miR, microRNA; hsa denotes that data were mapped to human miRBase using the Applied Biosystems “Lifescope” software, representing sheep miR orthologs. ↑>1.5 with threshold of >100 reads/million or >1.2 with threshold of >10,000 reads/million; RSD <50%. ↓<0.67 with threshold of >100 reads/million or <0.83 with threshold of >10,000 reads/million; RSD <50%.