Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 25;99(5):1825–1833. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3757

Table 5.

Univariate Analysis of Factors Associated With GH and IGF-1 Response for 90 Eligible Studies

Variables Comparison of Response Rates
GH, % 95% CI P Value IGF-1, % 95% CI P Value
Study type
    Retrospective 56 (47, 66) .88 54 (45, 62) .84
    Prospective 56 (51, 61) 55 (51, 59)
    Multicenter 57 (49, 66) .58 55 (47, 62) 1.00
    Single center 55 (49, 60) 55 (50, 60)
Treatment type
    Lantreotide 59 (50, 68) .37 53 (45, 61) .46
    Octreotide 55 (49, 60) 56 (0, 61)
Preselection favorable .09 .12
    Yes 61 (52, 70) 59 (51, 67)
    No 53 (48, 58) 53 (48, 57)
Prior SRL therapy .01 .41
    Yes 64 (55, 72) 57 (49, 64)
    No 52 (47, 57) 54 (49, 58)
Switch study .18 .29
    Yes 63 (51, 75) 60 (49, 70)
    No 54 (50, 59) 54 (50, 58)
GH criteria .94 .75
    <2.5 56 (43, 70) 56 (44, 68)
    2.5 56 (43, 69) 53 (41, 65)
    >2.5 54 (42, 66) 54 (44, 65)
Titration scheme .10 .40
    Titrated 55 (46, 65) 54 (46, 62)
    Fixed 46 (32, 60) 50 (37, 61)
    Fixed/titrated 61 (54, 68) 58 (51, 64)
SRL therapy naïve, %a .06 .40
    100% SRL Rx naïve 51 (38, 63) 53 (43, 64)
    0% SRL Rx naïve 63 (53, 73) 58 (49, 67)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Rx, therapy.

a

Extremes (100% SRL Rx naive: n = 38; 0% SRL Rx naive: n = 20).